a man walked diagonally across a square lot. approximately, what was the percent saved by not walking along the edges?
Walking diagonally across a square lot saves the man about 30% of the distance compared to following the two edges. This classic geometry puzzle highlights the efficiency of the shortest path.
Quick Math Breakdown
Assume the square has side length xxx.
- Edge path : Two sides, so 2x2x2x.
- Diagonal path : By Pythagoras, x2β1.414xx\sqrt{2}\approx 1.414xx2ββ1.414x.
- Savings : 2xβx2=x(2β1.414)=0.586x2x-x\sqrt{2}=x(2-1.414)=0.586x2xβx2β=x(2β1.414)=0.586x.
- Percent saved : 2β22Γ100%=(1β0.707)Γ100%β29.3%\frac{2-\sqrt{2}}{2}\times 100%=(1-0.707)\times 100%\approx 29.3%22β2ββΓ100%=(1β0.707)Γ100%β29.3%, or roughly 30%.
Why It Works
The diagonal is nature's shortcutβthink hypotenuse in a right triangle formed by the sides. Real-world example: Crossing a 100m x 100m field diagonally (141m) beats 200m along edges, saving ~59m or 30%.
Variations in Puzzles
- Some versions use rectangles (e.g., 3m x 4m), but this specifies a square.
- Exact value: 100(1β22)%β29.29%100(1-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2})%\approx 29.29%100(1β22ββ)%β29.29%, always rounded to 30%.
TL;DR : Approximately 30% saved.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.