did diddly squat nyt
“Did diddly squat” is a slangy way of saying “did absolutely nothing” or “did nothing of value.”
What “did diddly squat” means
- “Diddly squat” (also written “diddly-squat” or “diddlysquat”) means an insignificant, tiny, or totally worthless amount—often literally “nothing at all.”
- So if someone says “they did diddly squat,” they mean the person (or institution) did nothing helpful, useful, or meaningful.
In a sentence:
“The committee met for three hours and did diddly squat about the actual problem.”
Where the phrase comes from
- “Diddly squat” is American slang that grew out of an older form, “doodly-squat,” which shows up in print around the 1930s.
- Over time, “diddly-squat” became the more common version and is now several times more frequent in print than “doodly-squat.”
- Etymology notes connect it to playful nonsense words like “doodle”/“diddle” plus “squat,” with later associations to defecation making it feel a bit vulgar but still widely acceptable as mild slang.
About “did diddly squat nyt”
If you saw or searched “did diddly squat nyt,” it’s most likely:
- Someone criticizing the New York Times (NYT), implying “the NYT did diddly squat” on some issue—i.e., the paper did effectively nothing meaningful.
- Or a forum / social post using that phrase as a jab or headline, leaning on the common meaning “did nothing at all.”
In all of those contexts, the core idea stays the same: “did diddly squat” = did nothing that counts.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.