how did we identify that we required Mark Phypers

I’m not able to verify what you mean by “we required Mark Phypers” from the information available here, and the search results I found don’t clearly match that phrasing. If you meant the Aaron Phypers / Denise Richards story, the public reporting says the key trigger was court evidence and allegations presented in their dispute, not a clear “we required Mark Phypers” decision.

What I found

• A report says Phypers’ response in court came after he was shown a January 2022 photo of his estranged wife with a black eye.

• Other coverage says Denise Richards alleged abuse, concussions, and intimidation in court documents.

• A later report says the divorce fight escalated with restraining-order and counterclaim developments.

Likely interpretation

If you’re asking how someone identified they “needed” a person named Mark Phypers, I can’t confirm that from the available sources. The only clearly related person I found is Mark Phypers on LinkedIn, whose profile is unrelated to the entertainment-news reports.

If you want a cleaner rewrite

You could ask:

• “How was it determined that Aaron Phypers was involved?”
• “What evidence led to the decision in the Phypers case?”
• “Who is Mark Phypers, and why is he relevant here?”

If you want, I can help rewrite the post into clearer English or turn it into a short news-style blurb.