how many lands in a commander deck
You’ll usually want around 33–37 lands in a typical Commander deck, with most players landing near 36–38 for a solid, low‑risk baseline.
Below is a full “Quick Scoop”-style breakdown in the style you asked for.
How Many Lands in a Commander Deck?
If you just want a plug‑and‑play answer for a normal, non‑cEDH Commander deck, start at 36 lands and adjust a couple of cards up or down based on your ramp and curve.
“Most commander decks will have 35–40 lands total, basics and nonbasics.”
Quick Scoop
- Fast rule of thumb: 36 lands in a 99‑card deck.
- Common range: 33–37 for most casual decks, 35–40 if you like it safer.
- Lower land counts (33–34): Only if you run a lot of ramp (mana rocks, mana dorks, land ramp).
- Higher land counts (38–40+): For slower decks with big spells, no green ramp, or stax/prison that needs every land drop.
- Heuristic from some players: “28 + your commander’s mana value” as a rough starting formula.
The Common Ranges (And Why)
Think of Commander lands in three main bands people actually discuss on forums, articles, and videos.
1. Low end: 33–34 lands
Use this only if:
- Your deck has lots of ramp (Cultivate, Kodama’s Reach, Signets, Talismans, mana dorks, etc.).
- Your mana curve is low , and you’re mostly casting cheap spells.
- You expect shorter games or very fast combo (some cEDH lists live here).
This is popular in optimized or combo‑leaning lists where nonland slots are at a premium and ramp + card draw backfill land drops.
2. “Normal” band: 35–38 lands
This is where most casual and tuned Commander decks live:
- Many guides suggest 33–37 as the broad norm.
- Community discussions often quote 35–40 with 37 as a “sweet spot” for seeing 3–4 lands every ~10 cards.
Good baselines:
- 35–36 lands if:
- You play a fair amount of ramp.
- Your curve leans midrange.
- 37–38 lands if:
- You don’t have much ramp.
- You’re in colors without green and want consistent land drops.
3. High end: 39–41+ lands
This shows up when:
- Your curve is very high (lots of 6+ mana spells or an 8‑mana commander).
- You care a lot about never missing land drops (control, big mana, battlecruiser decks).
- Some deckbuilding advice caps it at about 41 lands at the most and 33 at the least.
A rough forum heuristic:
“Commander decks should have 28 + your commander’s cost in lands.”
So a 6‑mana commander → 34 lands baseline, then adjust for ramp and draw.
Factors That Change Your Land Count
Use these levers to move your land count up or down by a few cards from the 36‑land “default”.
1. Ramp density
- Lots of land ramp (Cultivate, Three Visits, Nature’s Lore, Rampant Growth): you can go down a few lands (33–35).
- Lots of mana rocks/dorks (Sol Ring, Signets, Llanowar Elves): similar effect, but remember rocks/dorks die to removal more easily.
- Almost no ramp : lean upward (37–40) so your deck actually does things on time.
2. Mana curve
- Low curve (lots of 1–3 drops): You can live at 33–35 lands , especially with ramp.
- Mid curve (lots of 3–5 drops): 36–38 is safer.
- High curve (many 6+ spells): Push to 38–40+ , especially if your commander is expensive.
3. Color identity
- Decks with green can often shave lands because of powerful ramp.
- 3–5 color decks need a well‑tuned mana base but not necessarily more total lands; you just need the right colors, often via nonbasics and fixing.
- 1–2 color decks may run more basics but have simpler mana needs.
4. Power level and game length
- Casual/battlecruiser: More lands = smoother, less “I’m stuck on 3 mana” games → 37–40 is common.
- Tuned/cEDH: Lower curves, dense ramp, cheap interaction → land counts trend toward the low 30s with more tutors and draw to compensate.
HTML Table: Typical Commander Land Counts
Here’s a quick HTML table you can drop into a post or article.
html
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Deck Type / Situation</th>
<th>Suggested Land Count</th>
<th>Why It Works</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Default casual Commander deck</td>
<td>36–38 lands</td>
<td>Stable land drops for most curves without heavy tuning.[web:3][web:7][web:9]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Low curve + lots of ramp</td>
<td>33–35 lands</td>
<td>Ramp spells and mana rocks cover land drops so you can dedicate more slots to spells.[web:1][web:3][web:9]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Midrange, moderate ramp</td>
<td>35–37 lands</td>
<td>Balances consistency with room for interaction and threats.[web:3][web:7]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>High curve / big spells</td>
<td>38–40+ lands</td>
<td>Helps ensure enough mana to cast expensive spells and double-spell later.[web:7][web:8]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>No green, little ramp</td>
<td>37–40 lands</td>
<td>Relies more on raw land draws for mana development.[web:3][web:9]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fast combo / cEDH style</td>
<td>31–34 lands</td>
<td>Very low curve plus dense ramp and card draw lets you trim lands.[web:2][web:9]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"28 + commander mana value" heuristic</td>
<td>~28 + CMC</td>
<td>Forum rule-of-thumb that scales land count with commander cost.[web:8]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Forum & “Latest Discussion” Flavor
Recent discussions and articles still orbit the same core idea:
- Many guides and gaming sites in 2024–2026 quote 33–37 lands as the main range, with adjustments for ramp and curve.
- Forum players often report playing 35–40 lands and call 37 a “sweet spot” for effortless land drops to turn 5–6.
- Some content creators argue for more lands than you think , suggesting 38–40 in slower metas to avoid mana‑screw, and they contrast this with cEDH lists that go far lower thanks to intense optimization.
It’s a bit of a culture war every few months: someone posts a low‑land list that “runs fine for them,” math and experienced players push back, and the consensus still settles around “mid‑30s, adjusted for ramp and curve.”
TL;DR (For Your Post Meta)
- For “how many lands in a commander deck” , the clean, SEO‑friendly answer is:
Most Commander decks run about 33–37 lands, with 36 as a strong default starting point, then tweak for ramp, curve, and power level.
Bottom note (as requested):
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and
portrayed here.