what did katie maloney say about charlie kirk

Katie Maloney first reacted to Charlie Kirk’s death by calling him a “monster” and saying people do not need to mourn him, then later clarified that she was not celebrating his killing or calling for violence.

What Did Katie Maloney Say About Charlie Kirk?

Her Initial Reaction

Shortly after news broke that conservative commentator Charlie Kirk had been assassinated, Katie Maloney posted about him on her Instagram Stories.

• She shared a message saying: “We do not celebrate death. But we also do not mourn monsters. Those two things can and do coexist. The absence of mourning does not imply the presence of celebration.”

• The wording made it clear she viewed Kirk as a “monster” and that she did not feel obliged to grieve his death.

• She also shared a graphic about there having been “at least 100 shootings at schools in 2025,” tying her reaction to broader anger about gun violence.

In some coverage and commentary, it was noted that she amplified or reposted content suggesting Kirk “deserved what happened,” which intensified backlash.

The Backlash Online

Her posts quickly went viral in Bravo and political circles and triggered strong reactions from both critics and supporters.

• Many viewers and commentators accused her of being cruel, celebrating a politically motivated killing, or going “too far” even if they disliked Kirk.

• Some people encouraged boycotts of her sandwich shop “Something About Her” and flooded review sites and comment sections with negative feedback.

• Others defended her, arguing that she was “telling the truth” about his rhetoric and had “nothing to apologize for.”

Online discussions became heated enough that fan communities had to remind users to focus on Katie’s behavior rather than turning threads into full-blown political debates.

Her Follow‑Up “Statement” and Clarification

Facing mounting criticism, Katie later issued a longer written statement to clarify what she meant.

• She emphasized that she was not celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and did not believe he “deserved to be assassinated,” saying differences should be settled through discussion, not violence.

• She reiterated, “I take no joy in Charlie Kirk’s death,” and said she grieves for his children and wife while also grieving for families affected by school shootings.

• She framed gun violence and the inability to disagree civilly as twin American tragedies and said she hoped to be “part of the solution” going forward.

However, some commentators felt her clarification was more of a justification than an apology and said she showed “no remorse,” while others thought she had already been clear and owed no further apology.

How People Are Reading It Now

The incident has become part of a broader conversation about how public figures react to the deaths of highly polarizing personalities.

• Critics see her “we do not mourn monsters” line as dehumanizing and dangerous, especially in the context of a political assassination.

• Supporters argue that her comments reflect moral outrage at Kirk’s past statements and his role in the political landscape, not a call to violence.

In other words, what Katie Maloney said about Charlie Kirk was that she did not mourn him and considered him a “monster,” but she later insisted she was not celebrating his murder and did not believe he should have been killed.

TL;DR:
Katie Maloney reacted to Charlie Kirk’s assassination by posting that “we do not mourn monsters” and highlighting school shootings, sparking major backlash; afterward, she clarified that she wasn’t celebrating his death and condemned violence, but debate over her tone and intent continues.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.