what did stephen king say about charlie kirk reddit
Stephen King posted (and later deleted) a message on X (formerly Twitter) claiming that Charlie Kirk had “advocated stoning gays to death,” then followed it up with a public apology saying he was wrong and had misinterpreted Kirk’s remarks.
What Did Stephen King Say About Charlie Kirk? (Reddit Context & Latest
Buzz)
The Core Incident
Here’s the basic sequence people on Reddit and other forums are talking about.
- After Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University in September 2025, Stephen King commented about the incident on X.
- In a reply referencing Kirk, King wrote a now‑deleted line along the lines of:
“He advocated stoning gays to death. Just sayin’.”
- That statement went viral, was heavily criticized as false and defamatory by conservative figures and commentators, and quickly became a flashpoint across social media and on Reddit threads.
Reddit posts in political and conservative subreddits spread screenshots of King’s original message and framed it as a “lie” or smear that he was “forced” to delete.
King’s Follow‑Up and Apology
King walked back his claim in follow‑up posts.
- He deleted the original post and wrote an apology saying he was wrong to state that Kirk had advocated stoning gay people.
- King clarified that what Kirk had actually done was cite or discuss biblical passages about homosexuality, which King said he had misinterpreted as advocacy rather than as an example of how people “cherry‑pick” scripture.
- In one of his apology lines, King essentially said: he apologized for saying Kirk advocated stoning gays, and that Kirk had actually been demonstrating how some people use selected biblical passages.
Some critics, including high‑profile conservatives like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, still called King’s original claim “false and defamatory” and argued that he should face consequences, which further fueled Reddit debates.
How Reddit Is Framing It
On Reddit, the discussion around “what did Stephen King say about Charlie Kirk” tends to focus on a few angles.
- Misinfo and responsibility:
Many users argue that public figures with large platforms should verify controversial claims before posting, especially right after a high‑profile death.
- Partisanship and outrage:
Threads highlight how quickly partisan communities rallied either to defend King as having made a bad but corrected mistake, or to portray him as malicious and dishonest.
- Free speech vs. defamation:
Some Reddit comments and YouTube political commentary videos frame the situation as a test case for when online speech crosses into potentially defamatory territory, especially when the subject is deceased but the family is still living.
A typical Reddit‑style summary of the incident in forums might look like:
“King claimed Kirk supported stoning gays, got absolutely hammered online when people pointed out that wasn’t what the clip showed, deleted it, then apologized saying he misread the biblical discussion. People are still calling for him to be held accountable.”
Key Facts At a Glance
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Who spoke? | Stephen King, bestselling horror author and frequent political commentator on X. | [3][7][5]
| About whom? | Charlie Kirk, conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder, who was fatally shot at a university event in Utah. | [3][7][5]
| Controversial claim | King wrote that Kirk “advocated stoning gays to death,” a claim that critics say misrepresented Kirk’s comments about biblical passages. | [1][7][9][5]
| What actually happened in Kirk’s remarks? | Kirk referenced Leviticus in a 2024 discussion while criticizing Ms. Rachel and Pride‑related content; he cited scripture about homosexuality being an “abomination,” which supporters say was theological commentary, not advocacy of violence. | [8][7]
| King’s correction | He deleted the original post and apologized, saying Kirk had not advocated stoning gays and that he had misinterpreted Kirk’s use of biblical passages. | [7][9][5]
| Reaction | Strong backlash from conservative politicians, commentators, and Reddit users, with some calling King’s original claim defamatory and irresponsible. | [10][5][6][7]
Why It’s a Trending Topic Now
Because this happened after Kirk’s highly publicized killing and involved a huge cultural figure in Stephen King, it hit several hotspots at once: gun violence, culture‑war politics, and online misinformation.
Discussions on Reddit and other platforms in late 2025 and early 2026 often put this story alongside broader worries about:
- How fast false or misleading claims spread during breaking news.
- Whether apologies from prominent figures are enough once misinformation has already been amplified.
- The double standard people perceive depending on which “side” makes a mistake.
TL;DR
- King initially said Charlie Kirk “advocated stoning gays to death,” which many argued was a misrepresentation of Kirk’s biblical commentary.
- He deleted the post, apologized, and clarified that Kirk had been illustrating how people cherry‑pick scripture, not personally endorsing stoning.
- Reddit threads focus on this as a case study in political polarization, misinformation, and the responsibility of high‑reach accounts after someone’s death.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.