what did trump say about minnesota

Trump has talked about Minnesota several times recently, mostly in the context of fraud, crime, immigration, and attacks on Democratic leaders in the state.

Key recent comments

• Trump has repeatedly highlighted what he describes as massive social services and childcare fraud in Minnesota, claiming that “they stole” huge sums of taxpayer money and calling it a “giant scam.”

• He has used Minnesota as a primary example of what he says is Democratic mismanagement of welfare and anti-poverty programs, tying the state to broader investigations his administration is pushing into alleged fraud in blue states.

On Governor Walz and state leadership

• Trump has attacked Minnesota Governor Tim Walz personally, calling him a “terrible governor” and “grossly incompetent” in interviews following high-profile shootings and political violence in the state.

• Despite condemning the violence and calling Minnesota “a truly great place,” he has suggested that engaging directly with Walz would be a “waste,” framing the governor as part of the problem rather than a partner.

On funding, fraud probes, and Minnesota’s image

• The Trump administration has announced or threatened suspensions and cuts of billions in federal funding for childcare subsidies, social services, and cash assistance in Minnesota and other Democratic-led states, justifying this as a response to “widespread fraud.”

• Officials aligned with Trump have described Minnesota as the starting point for a nationwide crackdown, saying the operation there is just the “tip of the iceberg” and linking state-level fraud probes to immigration and even potential terrorist financing.

On crime, immigration, and federal enforcement

• Trump has tied Minnesota to a tougher immigration and law-enforcement posture, including large deployments of federal agents to the Minneapolis area as part of an aggressive immigration crackdown.

• In public remarks and allied media coverage, Minnesota has been portrayed as a symbol of what Trump calls lax enforcement, especially around immigrant communities, with his team using these narratives to justify sweeps, fraud investigations, and funding freezes.

Political framing and 2026 context

• Minnesota also holds symbolic value for Trump electorally: he has noted that the state has “eluded” him in past campaigns, while still insisting he performed “exceptionally” there and raising unfounded concerns about election fraud.

• His recent comments about Minnesota fit a broader strategy of targeting high-profile Democratic governors and states, blending rhetoric about fraud, crime, and immigration with ongoing political and legal confrontations heading into the current political cycle.

Bottom note: Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.