what does british petroleum have to do with SCE

BP and SCE are connected mainly through an energy project: Southern California Edison was involved in discussions around a BP and Rio Tinto hydrogen/petroleum-coke clean-energy study, where BP was part of a joint venture exploring fuel and power options.

In plain English, BP is not “part of” SCE, and SCE is not owned by BP. The relationship was about a potential project collaboration in California energy policy and power generation, not a corporate merger or acquisition.

What that means

• BP : a global energy company.

• SCE : Southern California Edison, the electric utility serving much of Southern California.

• Link between them : BP appeared alongside Rio Tinto in a proposed clean-energy/petroleum-coke hydrogen project that SCE was discussing in the context of California regulation and customer costs.

Why people mention them together

That pairing usually comes up because of the California energy story around petroleum coke, hydrogen power, and utility regulation. SCE’s name shows up in the same discussion as BP because the utility was connected to the study and possible power-plant concept, not because the companies are otherwise closely tied.

Bottom line

BP and SCE have a project-level connection, not a parent-subsidiary relationship.

TL;DR: BP had to do with SCE through an energy project discussion, not ownership or control.