what does michael bengloss think about iran wart?

Michael Knowles seems to think the Iran war was a foreseeable, deliberate move by Trump: he says Trump had been signaling for years that he would not let Iran get a nuclear weapon, and that the strike was not a sudden impulse. He also says he is not celebrating it, and feels real trepidation about the U.S. getting pulled deeper into another Middle East war.

His main view

• He supports the idea that Iran should not get nuclear weapons.

• He says the strike fits Trump’s “peace through strength” approach.

• He thinks the attack was planned long in advance, not a last-minute reaction.

• He is worried about what happens next, including the risk of escalation or regime change.

The tone he takes

He is not sounding triumphant; he explicitly says he is glad U.S. forces are out of Iranian airspace, but also says he is “not dancing for joy.” His reaction is basically: the strike was expected, it made strategic sense in his view, but it opens the door to serious risks.

Quick note

You wrote “Michael Bengloss ,” but the result I found is about Michael Knowles. If you meant a different person, I can still help, but I’d need the exact name.