US Trends

what if in the tv show the real ghostbusters the ghostbusters saw gimmighoul from pokemon how would the ghostbusters react to and deal with this

Quick Scoop

If the Real Ghostbusters encountered Gimmighoul from Pokémon , their response would likely blend scientific curiosity, comedic confusion, and classic proton-pack problem-solving—because Gimmighoul isn’t a typical ghost in their universe.

First Reaction: “Is It a Ghost… or Something Else?”

The Ghostbusters are used to Class I–VII apparitions, but Gimmighoul would immediately stand out:

  • It’s bound to physical objects (coins or a chest), unlike free-roaming spirits.
  • It isn’t malicious by default—more mischievous and territorial.
  • It exhibits behavioral intelligence tied to treasure , not haunting.

Likely reactions:

  • Egon would scan it and realize it’s not emitting standard PKE readings.
  • Ray would be fascinated and compare it to folklore spirits like treasure goblins or yokai.
  • Peter would joke about it being “the world’s smallest bank robber.”
  • Winston would be cautious, treating it as a potential threat until proven otherwise.

Classification Problem

Gimmighoul would challenge their entire system. They might classify it as:

  • A Class II entity (interactive spirit) with physical anchoring.
  • Or create a new category: “Object-bound spectral symbiote.”

This matters because their usual solution—capture and containment —might not work the same way.

Attempted Capture (and Why It Gets Weird)

If they tried standard procedures:

  1. Proton streams
    • Likely ineffective or excessive.
    • Could damage the chest or coins rather than the entity itself.
  2. Ghost trap deployment
    • Might fail if Gimmighoul isn’t fully ectoplasmic.
    • It could simply retreat into coins or scatter.
  3. Containment unit
    • Even if captured, it might “anchor” to nearby metal objects and escape.

Key twist: Gimmighoul’s power is tied to material wealth , not haunting energy.

Smarter Strategy: Adapt Instead of Attack

Once Egon figures it out, the Ghostbusters would shift tactics.

Likely solution:

  • Remove or isolate its coin supply
  • Use controlled bait (coins) to lure it into a contained environment
  • Study rather than immediately trap

They might even build:

  • A coin-based containment chamber
  • Or a “reverse lure” device that neutralizes its attraction to treasure

Ethical Debate (Classic Ghostbusters Style)

This would spark a familiar argument:

  • Ray: “It’s not evil—it’s just collecting coins!”
  • Egon: “Its behavior suggests a non-hostile, resource-driven entity.”
  • Peter: “So we’re busting a haunted piggy bank?”
  • Winston: “If it starts draining bank vaults, it’s our problem.”

Conclusion: They’d likely relocate rather than destroy it.

Multi-Form Twist: Chest Form vs Roaming Form

If both forms appear:

  • Chest Form: Treated like a stationary haunting object (easier to manage).
  • Roaming Form: Much harder—acts like a swarm of coin-possessed micro-entities.

This could lead to a full episode plot:

  • Coins mysteriously disappearing across NYC
  • Gimmighoul multiplying via loose change
  • Ghostbusters chasing a citywide “currency haunting”

Final Outcome: Containment or Coexistence?

Most likely ending (in true Real Ghostbusters fashion):

  • They don’t destroy Gimmighoul.
  • They relocate it to a controlled environment (possibly even keep it in the firehouse for study).
  • Ray secretly feeds it coins.

Example Scene

Egon adjusts his scanner.
“Fascinating. It is neither fully spectral nor entirely physical.” Peter sighs. “Great. A ghost that robs vending machines.” The tiny Gimmighoul rattles happily inside a pile of coins. Winston: “So what’s the plan?” Egon: “We stop thinking like exterminators… and start thinking like economists.”

TL;DR

  • The Ghostbusters would be confused at first because Gimmighoul doesn’t behave like a traditional ghost.
  • Standard ghost-catching tools might fail or be ineffective.
  • They would adapt, using coins as bait and studying it rather than destroying it.
  • The situation would likely end with containment, relocation, or coexistence—not elimination.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.