what is going on with brad pitts winery does this buyer from jolie get a say in the dealings of the winery

The short version: Brad Pitt is still in a major legal fight over Château Miraval, and the buyer Jolie sold to (Stoli Group / Tenute del Mondo, tied to Yuri Shefler) does have a stake and a say—but that role is exactly what Pitt is trying to limit or unwind through the courts.

Quick Scoop: What’s Going On?

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie bought Château Miraval, a French estate and winery, together back in 2008 and used it for their wedding in 2014. After their split, Miraval became one of the big flashpoints in their post-divorce disputes.

In October 2021, Jolie sold her stake in the Miraval business to Tenute del Mondo, the wine division of the Stoli Group, which is associated with Russian businessman Yuri Shefler. Pitt says she did this without his consent, breaking an understanding that neither would sell without the other’s approval.

Who Owns What Now?

Here’s the basic structure as described in court filings and reports:

• Pitt still owns his share of the Miraval companies and controls the day‑to‑day operations of the estate and brand, at least in practice.

• Jolie sold her interest to Tenute del Mondo (Stoli Group), so that buyer now holds the stake that used to be hers.

• Pitt is suing to undo that sale or limit its effects, arguing that:
  • There was a mutual agreement not to sell without each other’s consent.

* The buyer is an “aggressive third‑party competitor” trying to take over the business.

* The sale was “vindictive” and “unlawful.”

At the same time, Jolie’s side argues there was no binding contract blocking her from selling and that she wanted financial independence and closure.

Does the Buyer Get a Say?

In practical business terms, yes: if Tenute del Mondo/Stoli owns Jolie’s old stake, it has shareholder rights in the entities that own Miraval. That typically includes:

• Voting on certain corporate decisions (depending on the shareholder agreement).

• Sharing in profits and distributions.

• Potential influence over strategic direction, especially if they hold a large minority stake.

However, the exact degree of say is heavily contested:

• Pitt claims the new owner is attempting a “hostile takeover” of the winery business and interfering with his ability to run Miraval.

• He’s asking the court to unwind or neutralize that sale, which would obviously reduce or eliminate the buyer’s influence if he wins.

• Until the case is resolved, Pitt also argues the dispute has “stymied” the business and blocked him from fully enjoying and using the property.

So right now, the buyer has legal ownership and some formal say—but its power is under legal attack and may be reshaped by the eventual verdict.

Latest Legal Moves (As of 2026)

A few key recent developments:

• The trial over the winery is currently projected for 2027, with Jolie seeking to push it to late 2027 and Pitt resisting a long delay.

• Pitt’s side says delaying the case is letting key evidence and witnesses slip away.

• Jolie’s side says the case isn’t ready yet due to ongoing international discovery and unresolved issues.

• In June 2026, a California court granted Pitt’s team a motion compelling depositions from members of the Stoli Group, including executives tied to the sale.

* That’s viewed as a win for Pitt, because he can question the buyer’s representatives under oath about how the sale happened and what their plans for Miraval are.

This all shows the buyer isn’t just passively owning the stake; they’re now directly pulled into the litigation and have to answer detailed questions about their role.

How Jolie Herself Fits In Now

Jolie has said in court documents that she and the children haven’t returned to the property since the “painful events” around the divorce, and that she left Pitt full control and residency of the homes in Los Angeles and at Miraval without compensation. She describes the sale of her stake as part of gaining financial independence and peace.

Even though she no longer owns the stake, she’s still a central party in the lawsuit because Pitt is trying to undo the sale and claim breach of their alleged agreement. The buyer’s rights and influence at the winery are therefore intertwined with whatever the court decides about Jolie’s actions.

Different Angles People Are Taking

Because this is a big celebrity and business story, you’ll see multiple viewpoints:

• Business angle
  • Some see Pitt trying to protect a brand he largely built and financed and resist what he calls a hostile business partner.

* Others note that Stoli/Shefler are experienced in wine and spirits and would expect meaningful influence if they’re investing.

• Personal/ethical angle
  • Pitt’s filings frame Jolie’s sale as meant to “inflict harm” and as vindictive.

* Jolie’s filings frame it as a step toward safety, independence, and closure after a traumatic period.

• Legal/procedure angle
  • The long timeline, repeated trial date disputes, and ongoing discovery make it clear this is a complex international corporate and family-law tangle.

Simple Answer to Your Core Question

• What’s going on with Brad Pitt’s winery?
  It’s in the middle of a high‑stakes legal battle over Jolie’s 2021 sale of her stake to the Stoli Group, with trials and depositions scheduled into 2027.

• Does the buyer from Jolie get a say in the dealings of the winery?
  Yes, as the owner of her former stake, the buyer has legal rights and a seat at the table—but Pitt is actively fighting in court to limit or undo that influence, claiming a hostile takeover and breach of their prior understanding.

TL;DR: Jolie sold her share of Château Miraval to the Stoli Group, so that buyer technically has a say in how the winery is run—but the extent of that power is exactly what Brad Pitt is attacking in ongoing litigation that’s not expected to fully wrap up until around 2027.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.