US Trends

which states are keeping the power plants open

Which States Are Keeping Power Plants Open?

As of mid‑2026, a small group of states is actively keeping aging fossil‑fuel plants running past their planned retirement dates—mostly through federal emergency orders and a few state‑level deals tied to rising electricity demand.

The big picture: federal orders vs. state choices

Most of the “keeping plants open” story in 2025–2026 is about federal emergency orders from the Trump administration directing specific coal (and some gas/oil) units to stay online, not states voluntarily choosing to keep everything running.

At the same time, Pennsylvania stands out as a state that has explicitly moved to extend the life of coal plants under a consent agreement with the plant owner, citing data‑center demand and grid reliability.

States where plants are being kept open (2025–2026)

1. Michigan

  • The J.H. Campbell coal plant in Michigan has been ordered multiple times by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to delay closure and keep operating past its planned retirement.
  • These orders were issued even though grid operators said they didn’t request the plants to stay on, and the extra costs are expected to be passed to ratepayers.
  • Environmental groups and some state officials have pushed back, arguing the policy is expensive and unnecessary, but the federal orders have kept the units running.

2. Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania appears in two different ways: A. Federally ordered delays

  • At least one older oil/gas‑fired plant in Pennsylvania was subject to a last‑minute federal order to remain open even though it was scheduled to shut down.
  • The Eddystone fossil‑fuel plant (Units 3 and 4) in Pennsylvania had its closure delayed by a DOE emergency order directing the operator to keep the units running.

B. State‑backed extension of coal plants

  • In April 2026, Governor Josh Shapiro announced a move to keep two western Pennsylvania coal plants—Keystone Generating Station and Conemaugh Generating Station —running through at least 2032.
  • The plants’ owner had previously said it would close them by 2028 rather than meet new federal wastewater rules, but reversed course as data‑center demand drove up power prices.
  • The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection entered a consent decree giving the plants more time to comply with wastewater standards, with daily fines if they miss targets.
  • Supporters (including the plant union and some politicians) argue this protects jobs and reliability; critics say it delays pollution controls and reflects the environmental cost of the AI/data‑center boom.

3. Washington

  • The last coal‑fired unit in Washington state , scheduled to close at the end of 2025, was ordered by the DOE to remain online instead of shutting down as planned.
  • That order fits the broader federal pattern of keeping specific coal units running past their retirement dates.

4. Other states affected by federal orders

Reporting from mid‑2026 notes that the Trump administration issued orders to keep five aging coal plants across four states operating beyond their planned closures, contributing to hundreds of millions of dollars in extra costs.

Public sources naming specific locations so far include:

  • Michigan (J.H. Campbell)
  • Pennsylvania (Eddystone units, plus other older fossil units)
  • Washington (last coal unit)

The fourth state in the “five plants in four states” set isn’t always spelled out in brief summaries, but the overall pattern is clear: a handful of states are seeing federally mandated extensions of coal and some fossil‑fuel generation.

Why are these plants being kept open?

Multiple factors are cited in news and policy discussions:

  • Grid reliability concerns : Officials argue that keeping existing baseload plants online helps avoid shortages, especially during peak demand or extreme weather.
  • Surging electricity demand from data centers : The AI/data‑center boom has sharply increased load forecasts in some regions, making older plants look more “needed” than they did a few years earlier.
  • Political and ideological priorities : The Trump administration has framed keeping coal and other fossil plants running as part of an “energy dominance” agenda, even when grid operators say they don’t need them.
  • Economic and job arguments : Unions and some state leaders highlight job preservation and local economic impacts as reasons to delay closures.

Costs and controversy

Keeping plants open past their planned retirements is not free:

  • Estimates from 2025–2026 suggest Americans could be paying billions of dollars extra per year in energy bills if such policies continue at scale.
  • In Michigan alone, ratepayers were reported to be on the hook for around $180 million to keep one coal plant open under federal mandates.
  • Several states and environmental groups have challenged the federal orders in court , arguing they force utilities to run uneconomic and polluting plants that were already scheduled to close.

How this differs from nuclear moratoriums

It’s worth distinguishing this coal/gas “keep open” story from nuclear moratoriums :

  • Some states (like California, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and others) maintain moratoriums or restrictions on building new nuclear plants , though existing nuclear facilities can still operate.
  • A few states, including Illinois and New Jersey , moved in 2026 to repeal or adjust long‑standing nuclear bans, but that’s about future nuclear development, not keeping old coal plants open.

Bottom line

  • The states most clearly “keeping power plants open” in 2025–2026 are Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Washington , with additional fossil units in at least one other state affected by federal emergency orders.
  • In most cases, this is driven by federal directives to delay closures, with Pennsylvania as the standout example of a state government also actively negotiating to extend coal plant lifetimes.
  • The policy is controversial because of higher costs to ratepayers , environmental impacts , and disputes over whether the plants are actually needed for reliability.

TL;DR:
A small set of states—especially Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Washington —are seeing coal and other fossil‑fuel plants kept open past their planned retirement dates, mainly due to federal emergency orders and, in Pennsylvania’s case, a state‑backed deal tied to data‑center demand.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.