which type of interview request, direct or indirect, would lead to more interviews? why? which type would you prefer?
A direct interview request would usually lead to more interviews because it is clear, confident, and makes your purpose unmistakable to the recipient.
Direct vs indirect requests
- A direct request states plainly that you are asking for an interview, what it is about, and often suggests a time or next step. This clarity reduces confusion and makes it easier for the other person to say yes or no quickly.
- An indirect request hints at wanting an interview (for example, “I’d love to chat sometime about your work”) without clearly stating that you’re asking for a formal interview, which can lead to delays, misunderstandings, or no response at all.
Why direct gets more interviews
- Direct requests are more likely to get responses because they respect the other person’s time: the purpose is obvious and the decision is simple. This tends to translate into more successful interview invitations overall.
- A direct approach also signals confidence and seriousness, which many professionals and organizations appreciate, especially when they receive a lot of vague or casual messages.
Which type to prefer
- From a results and professionalism standpoint, the direct approach is generally the better choice and the one to prefer in most academic, journalistic, or job‑related contexts.
- An indirect style might feel safer for very shy or early‑stage students, but it usually trades emotional comfort for a lower chance of actually securing the interview, so it is less effective overall.
TL;DR: A direct interview request typically leads to more interviews because it is clearer, faster to process, and shows confidence; for that reason, it is usually the preferable approach.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.