US Trends

who did ro khanna name

Ro Khanna recently named six men whose identities had been redacted in the Jeffrey Epstein documents, reading them into the Congressional Record on the House floor.

Who Ro Khanna Named

Ro Khanna said the Justice Department had improperly blacked out the names of several “wealthy, powerful men” connected to the Epstein files and proceeded to identify them publicly. He argued that these names should be visible for the sake of transparency, especially given that some victims’ names were left unredacted while these men’s identities were concealed.

The six men he named were:

  • Leslie Wexner – Billionaire and former head of the company that owned Victoria’s Secret, who once employed Jeffrey Epstein to manage his finances.
  • Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem – Chief executive officer of global logistics firm DP World.
  • Salvatore Nuara – A less publicly known figure whose name appeared in the unredacted material reviewed by lawmakers.
  • Zurab Mikeladze – Another relatively unknown individual identified from the same documents.
  • Leonic Leonov – One of the lesser-known names listed by Khanna in his remarks.
  • Nicola Caputo – Also among the lower-profile individuals whose names were originally redacted.

Khanna emphasized that naming these individuals does not by itself establish criminal guilt but is about consistency and openness in how the records are released.

Why This Is Trending Now

This episode is trending in early 2026 because it taps into several high‑profile themes at once: demands for transparency in the Epstein case, public anger over perceived protection of elites, and scrutiny of how the Justice Department decides what to redact. Khanna and his Republican colleague Thomas Massie framed the issue as one of fairness, noting that victims’ identities were sometimes visible while influential men’s names were hidden.

Some commentators see Khanna’s move as a bold step toward accountability for powerful figures associated with Epstein, even if only by mention in documents. Others caution that reading names in Congress risks blurring the line between being mentioned in files and being formally accused of a crime, especially for the lesser-known individuals whose roles are not yet clearly understood.

Different Viewpoints

Here are a few perspectives circulating in news coverage and forums:

  • Pro‑transparency view:
    Many civil-liberties and victims’ advocates argue that exposing the names of wealthy associates is necessary so the public can evaluate the full scope of Epstein’s network. They say secrecy has long shielded elite figures, and this step helps rebalance power toward the public and victims.
  • Due‑process concern:
    Legal analysts and some commentators warn that simply appearing in redacted files does not necessarily mean criminal conduct, and public naming could stigmatize people who may only have tangential or informational ties to the case. They stress the importance of distinguishing between being a target of an investigation and being a source or an incidental reference.
  • Institutional accountability angle:
    Other observers focus less on the individuals and more on the Justice Department, arguing that inconsistent redactions undermine trust in the agency. From this perspective, Khanna’s speech is a way of pressuring institutions to apply the same standard to powerful men that they apply to victims and lesser‑known figures.

Quick HTML Fact Box

Below is a compact HTML snippet you could embed directly in a blog post under a “Quick Scoop” or sidebar section.

html

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Person Named</th>
      <th>Who They Are</th>
      <th>Context in Epstein Files</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>Leslie Wexner</td>
      <td>Billionaire, former Victoria’s Secret parent-company head[web:3][web:9]</td>
      <td>Previously employed Epstein as money manager; identified as a source of information, not a target per his lawyer[web:3][web:9]</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem</td>
      <td>CEO of global logistics firm DP World[web:3][web:9]</td>
      <td>Named among redacted individuals in DOJ-handled Epstein documents[web:3][web:9]</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Salvatore Nuara</td>
      <td>Lesser-known figure, limited public profile[web:9]</td>
      <td>Listed by Khanna as one of six originally redacted names[web:9]</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Zurab Mikeladze</td>
      <td>Little publicly known; not widely covered before release[web:9]</td>
      <td>Appears in materials reviewed by Khanna and Massie[web:9]</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Leonic Leonov</td>
      <td>Low public profile, scant biographical detail available[web:9]</td>
      <td>Included in the set of six names read on the House floor[web:9]</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Nicola Caputo</td>
      <td>Another relatively obscure figure in public reporting[web:9]</td>
      <td>Named by Khanna as one of the men whose identities were initially blacked out[web:9]</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

SEO‑Friendly Meta Description

Here’s a meta description tailored to your topic and keywords:

Ro Khanna has sparked fresh debate after naming six powerful men originally redacted from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Learn who he named, why it matters, and what people are saying.

If you write more on this, do you want the focus to be more on the individuals he named, or on the broader issue of transparency and DOJ redactions?