why are people mad at pam bondi
People are upset with Pam Bondi, the current U.S. Attorney General under President Trump, for a mix of partisan clashes, policy decisions, and recent controversies that have alienated both Democrats and some conservatives.
Her tenure has sparked heated debates, especially after high-profile Senate hearings and statements that critics see as politicizing justice.
Election Denialism and Voting Rights Issues
Bondi's past involvement with groups pushing 2020 election falsehoods has drawn sharp criticism from voting rights advocates. She actively promoted claims of widespread fraud in Pennsylvania, including "fake ballots" and votes from deceased people, despite courts rejecting these arguments.
Democrats argue this history undermines her ability to enforce voting laws fairly as AG, with her prior letters to election officials amplifying fears of noncitizen voting tied to baseless theories.
"Bondi played an early and active role in spreading falsehoods about the 2020 election."
Civil Rights and LGBTQ+ Record
Bondi faces backlash for inconsistent stances on civil rights. During her Florida AG days, she defended a same-sex marriage ban, later claiming it respected the constitution rather than her views.
A resurfaced comment equating LGBTQ+ identity to "bringing a heroin needle to school" has fueled accusations of unreliable commitment to laws like the Civil Rights Act and Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act. Senate Democrats, led by Dick Durbin, demand she clarify her record.
Hate Speech Controversy Post-Kirk Assassination
After Charlie Kirk's assassination in 2025, Bondi distinguished "free speech" from "hate speech" on a podcast, vowing to "target" those inciting violence amid rising antisemitism on campuses.
This ignited fury from MAGA figures like Matt Walsh, Erick Erickson, and Dan Bongino, who called her remarks "nonsense," a betrayal of First Amendment absolutism, and grounds for firing. She clarified it meant threats only, but conservatives accused her of rolling back free speech gains.
"Get rid of her. Today. This is insane. We have fought for decades... Now Bondi wants to roll it all back for no reason." – Matt Walsh on X
DOJ Weaponization Claims and Senate Clashes
In October 2025 Senate hearings, Democrats grilled Bondi on prosecuting figures like James Comey and Letitia James, alleging White House influence and DOJ as a "shield" for Trump allies. She fired back aggressively, accusing senators of anti-Trump bias and deflecting on Jeffrey Epstein file releases.
Critics highlighted her refusal to confirm recovering $50k allegedly given to Tom Homan and her Epstein video claims, later softened, prompting internal FBI tensions. Forums like Reddit called the hearings "disgusting" displays of arrogance.
Lobbying and Conflicts of Interest
Pre-nomination, Bondi lobbied for wealthy clients and foreign governments via Ballard Partners, failing to flag multiple conflicts during vetting. Durbin criticized this as not prioritizing Americans over special interests.
Multiple Viewpoints
- Democrats/liberals : View her as unfit due to election denial, civil rights flip-flops, and perceived politicization (e.g., Brennan Center, Senate Dems).
- MAGA/right-wing : Split—some back her Trump loyalty, but many despise her "hate speech" stance clashing with absolutist views (e.g., Kirk's legacy).
- Trump's stance : He supports her fully, dismissing critics despite backlash.
TL;DR: Bondi's unpopularity stems from her election denial past, civil rights inconsistencies, aggressive Senate defenses, lobbying ties, and especially her post-assassination "hate speech" comments that enraged free speech hardliners—even as she clarified targeting violence only.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.