US Trends

why did pepsi use the polar bear

Pepsi used the polar bear as a bold way to “hijack” Coca‑Cola’s most famous mascot and turn decades of Coke brand equity into attention for Pepsi Zero Sugar.

Quick Scoop

What actually happened

  • The bear in the recent Pepsi Zero Sugar Super Bowl spot is clearly modeled on Coca‑Cola’s classic polar bear, a mascot Coke has used in major campaigns since the early 1990s.
  • In the ad, the bear does a blind taste test and chooses Pepsi Zero Sugar, then spirals into a kind of humorous “identity crisis” in therapy because he’s supposed to be loyal to Coke.
  • The spot revives the old “Pepsi Challenge” idea (blind tasting, red vs blue), but wrapped in a story instead of a lab‑style test.

Why Pepsi did it (strategy in plain terms)

  1. Steal instant recognition
    • Coke’s polar bear is not just a cute character; it’s a deeply embedded symbol of Coke, Christmas, and family for multiple generations.
 * By using a look‑alike bear, Pepsi taps into that built‑in memory so viewers “get” the setup in seconds without any explanation.
  1. Signal confidence and “challenger” energy
    • Commentators point out this is the kind of risky move a challenger brand can make: using the rival’s most sacred asset to say “we’re so confident in our taste, even their own bear prefers us.”
 * The move acts like a flex: if Pepsi is willing to poke Coke’s icon on the biggest stage (the Super Bowl), it frames Pepsi as bolder, more fun, and more modern.
  1. Put Coke in a no‑win situation
    • Analysts note that if Coca‑Cola publicly reacts, they only give the Pepsi ad more oxygen; if they ignore it, Pepsi’s story stands uncontested.
 * Either path keeps the conversation centered on Pepsi’s taste message and creative risk, not on Coke’s own ads.
  1. Tell an emotional, “right‑brain” story instead of a hard claim
    • Creative reviews highlight that the ad doesn’t hammer you with data or methodology; it lets the bear’s mini breakdown carry the persuasion.
 * Testing from System1 (shared in industry posts) suggested it landed in the top tier of Super Bowl ads for brand‑building, with the vast majority of viewers correctly linking it to Pepsi, not Coke.

Why a polar bear, specifically?

  • Coke’s first polar bear ads go back as far as 1922, and the modern animated bears have run since 1993, especially around winter and Christmas.
  • Over time that turned the bear into what marketers call a “distinctive asset”: one visual that instantly triggers a brand in your mind.
  • Pepsi’s twist is to make that same bear feel torn, set to Queen’s “I Want to Break Free,” turning his crisis into a metaphor for people who grew up with “red” but now actually prefer Pepsi Zero Sugar’s taste.

Forum / discussion angles people are talking about

“Isn’t Pepsi just giving Coke free advertising?”
Many marketing breakdowns argue no, because tests show viewers overwhelmingly understood it was a Pepsi ad and associated the story with Pepsi, not Coke.

“Can Pepsi even do this legally?”
Legal and commentary videos suggest that as long as they avoid trademarked exact designs and stay in parody/satire territory, they can create a polar bear character that clearly references Coke’s bear without copying it pixel‑for‑pixel.

“Why does this feel like a big moment in the old ‘Cola Wars’?”
Writers say it re‑energizes a rivalry that had gone quieter, echoing the classic Pepsi Challenge era but in a more cinematic, character‑driven way for today’s audience.

Latest chatter and 2026 context

  • The ad ran around Super Bowl LX and quickly became a talking point among marketers and on professional networks, with people calling it a “heist” of Coke’s most valuable mascot.
  • Commentators frame it as a case study in how memory, nostalgia, and parody can be used in 2026 to cut through crowded, often AI‑polished advertising.

TL;DR: Pepsi used the polar bear because it’s Coke’s most powerful symbol, and by making that bear choose Pepsi Zero Sugar and then question its whole identity, Pepsi turned 30+ years of Coke nostalgia into a fresh, confident ad about taste and “breaking free.”

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.