No, there is no declared war between the United States and Greenland (or Denmark), and no government has formally announced that war is about to start.

What’s actually happening

Recent headlines and commentary are about:

  • The Trump administration openly talking again about “taking” or acquiring Greenland, including not fully ruling out military options.
  • Strong pushback from Denmark, Greenlandic leaders, and European allies, who call the idea of annexation or a U.S. military takeover “unfathomable” and warn it would threaten NATO itself.
  • Analysis pieces and security experts gaming out “what if the US invaded Greenland?” scenarios, but these are explanations of consequences, not reports of a decision to invade.

So this is a political and diplomatic crisis, plus a lot of speculative analysis, not an announced war plan.

Why people are worried

  • Top U.S. officials have said military force is “on the table” as one of several options to gain control of Greenland, even while also talking about a purchase or “deal.”
  • Greenlandic ministers say people are “very, very worried,” kids are scared, and they fear being sold or annexed without their consent.
  • European leaders warn that if the U.S. attacked a NATO ally (Denmark/Greenland), it would shatter NATO’s basic promise and upend the security order since World War II.

Those statements make the rhetoric feel much more intense and understandably fuel online questions like “are we going to war with Greenland.”

How likely is an actual war?

Most expert and political signals point to war being unlikely, even if the rhetoric is aggressive:

  • U.S. public opinion is strongly against using military force to seize Greenland, according to polling cited in major outlets.
  • Analysts note that a U.S. invasion of a NATO ally would trigger an enormous political, legal, and strategic backlash at home and abroad, which makes it a very high‑cost option.
  • Commentators emphasize that while the administration is using hardline language, the more realistic paths involve pressure, negotiations, or expanded military presence, not a full-scale war.

In other words, the talk about force is real and serious, but an outright war is still seen as a low‑probability, high‑catastrophe scenario in expert analysis.

What to watch next

If you are tracking whether this drifts closer to war, the key signs would be:

  • Sudden, large military deployments or exercises around Greenland that are clearly not routine.
  • Formal steps in Washington toward authorizing military action specifically against Greenland/Denmark (e.g., concrete war powers moves, not just speeches).
  • A breakdown of high‑level diplomacy: if upcoming U.S.–Denmark–Greenland meetings collapse with both sides saying cooperation is over.

Right now, the focus is on tense diplomacy, public pressure, and alliance politics, not an announced plan to go to war with Greenland.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.