Garrett likely didn’t “just block” his father because the story frames the relationship as more complicated than a simple cut-off, with Garrett carrying unresolved family pressure, money leverage, and emotional baggage rather than making a clean break. One recent discussion of the character also notes that his father never gave him a healthy model for opening up, which helps explain why he tolerates the connection instead of ending it outright.

Why it reads that way

  • Family control matters. A forum discussion about the character says he stays around because Phil threatens to cut off his money, so the relationship has a practical hold as well as an emotional one.
  • He’s written as conflict-avoidant. The same interview suggests Garrett hasn’t seen an easy model for vulnerability because his dad never showed him one, which can make boundary-setting feel unnatural.
  • The plot needs tension. In stories like this, the point is often that the parent remains a source of pressure, so the character keeps getting pulled back into the dynamic instead of cleanly blocking contact.

Different reads

  • Literal reading: He may simply not have thought of blocking him in the moment, especially if the scene is about stress rather than strategy.
  • Emotional reading: He may not want the finality of blocking, even if he hates the contact.
  • Storytelling reading: The writers may be leaving the door open for later conflict or reconciliation beats.

What fans are saying

“Garret absolutely hates his father. There is no chance of a reconciliation happening. He's there only because Phil threatened to cut his money...”

That matches the broader sense that the relationship is less about affection and more about coercion, which makes a simple block feel less realistic inside the story.

TL;DR: Garrett probably didn’t block his father because the relationship is tied up in control, money, and deep emotional dysfunction, not because he’s unaware of the option.