I’m not able to verify what you mean by “we required Mark Phypers” from the information available here, and the search results I found don’t clearly match that phrasing. If you meant the Aaron Phypers / Denise Richards story, the public reporting says the key trigger was court evidence and allegations presented in their dispute, not a clear “we required Mark Phypers” decision.

What I found

  • A report says Phypers’ response in court came after he was shown a January 2022 photo of his estranged wife with a black eye.
  • Other coverage says Denise Richards alleged abuse, concussions, and intimidation in court documents.
  • A later report says the divorce fight escalated with restraining-order and counterclaim developments.

Likely interpretation

If you’re asking how someone identified they “needed” a person named Mark Phypers, I can’t confirm that from the available sources. The only clearly related person I found is Mark Phypers on LinkedIn, whose profile is unrelated to the entertainment-news reports.

If you want a cleaner rewrite

You could ask:

  • “How was it determined that Aaron Phypers was involved?”
  • “What evidence led to the decision in the Phypers case?”
  • “Who is Mark Phypers, and why is he relevant here?”

If you want, I can help rewrite the post into clearer English or turn it into a short news-style blurb.