Venezuelan officials have condemned the U.S. strikes as an illegal act of “imperialist aggression” and a threat to regional stability, framing the attack as a colonial-style attempt at regime change that will ultimately fail. Inside the country, the mood is reported as a mix of anger, fear, confusion, and defiance, with people reeling from explosions, power cuts, and uncertainty over casualties and the captured leadership.

Official mood in Venezuela

  • The Venezuelan government has formally said it “rejects, repudiates and denounces” the U.S. attacks, calling them a criminal assault that endangers millions of lives.
  • Authorities describe the strikes as a violation of sovereignty and have asked the U.N. Security Council to intervene against what they label unlawful military aggression.

On the streets and in society

  • Reports from Caracas and other hit areas say residents woke to multiple explosions, smoke over military sites, and partial blackouts, leaving many scared, stunned, and unsure what comes next.
  • Early coverage notes that Venezuelan society is “reeling,” with people worried about family safety, possible further strikes, and the risk of wider conflict or internal chaos after their president’s capture.

Within the state and military

  • Maduro’s declaration of a national state of emergency and activation of defenses reflects a leadership posture of alarm mixed with defiance, signaling that the remaining command structure sees this as a war-level attack.
  • Defense officials have denounced the operation as a terrorist-style strike on urban areas and are still trying to assess casualties, heightening anger within military and government circles.

Divided public opinions

  • While the government and its core supporters appear united in outrage toward Washington, segments of the opposition have historically opposed Maduro and may feel conflicted—relieved at his removal but fearful of foreign intervention and its civilian toll.
  • Commentators and regional voices caution that even Venezuelans critical of Maduro can resent a foreign military attack, meaning national feeling may tilt toward nationalist anger even amid internal political divisions.

Regional and global emotional backdrop

  • Close allies such as Cuba have echoed Venezuela’s language, calling the U.S. action a “criminal attack” and urging an urgent response, which reinforces a narrative in Venezuela that the country is a victim of great-power aggression.
  • At the same time, some foreign governments express concern mainly about escalation and civilian harm rather than about Maduro personally, which feeds a Venezuelan sense of being a battleground in larger geopolitical games.

Overall, when people ask “how does Venezuela feel about the attack,” the clearest picture so far is: officially furious, nationally shaken, and deeply anxious about what the next hours and days will bring.

TL;DR: Venezuelan leaders are denouncing the strike as illegal imperial aggression, many ordinary people are scared and shocked, and even critics of Maduro are torn between anger at him and anger at foreign bombs falling on their country.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.