No, the newly released Epstein-related documents do not provide proven, independently verified evidence of literal cannibalism, but they do contain at least one extremely graphic allegation that online communities are now describing as “cannibalism.”

What the files actually say

From reporting on the 2026 document release tied to the “Epstein files,” there is a redacted victim statement describing a supposed party on a yacht where:

  • Babies were allegedly dismembered, their intestines removed, and
  • Feces from those intestines were allegedly eaten by unnamed individuals.

This is why people on forums and social media are now claiming “there is cannibalism in the Epstein files” or saying “cannibalism confirmed.”

How this links to the Gabriela Rico Jiménez clip

The viral 2009 video of Mexican model Gabriela Rico JimĂ©nez shouting “they ate humans” about global elites has resurfaced because:

  • In that clip she accuses powerful people of ritual abuse and cannibalism.
  • After the 2026 document dump, some outlets and posters are connecting her old claims to the new yacht-allegation document, saying it “supports” or “echoes” her story.

However, officials and mainstream coverage note there is no direct documentary proof in these files that confirms her specific claims or explains her disappearance.

Allegations vs. confirmed facts

It is important to separate three layers:

  1. Documented allegation in the files
    • A victim statement describes ritualistic abuse, dismemberment of babies, and people consuming feces from intestines on an Epstein-linked yacht.
 * The same statement flags the witness’s history of drug use and severe prior abuse, which investigators also note in the file.
  1. Online interpretation
    • Forums and social media threads summarize this as “cannibalism in the Epstein files,” often without nuance.
 * Conspiracy-oriented sites bundle this with broader claims about a “global cannibalism network.”
  1. Verified evidence
    • So far, public reporting does not show physical evidence or corroborated investigative findings that conclusively prove organized cannibalism among Epstein’s network, despite the graphic allegation being present in the documents.

In other words: the files contain at least one horrific allegation that strongly implies cannibalistic behavior, but that allegation is not the same as fully verified fact.

Why this is trending now

  • The U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly released a massive batch of Epstein-related material (millions of pages, images, and videos) under an “Epstein Files Transparency” law signed in late 2025, making these documents widely discussed for the first time in early 2026.
  • Commentators and streamers are focusing on the most shocking elements—ritual abuse, the “I loved the torture video” email line, and the yacht-party allegation—because they drive outrage and views, which is amplifying the “cannibalism” narrative.

How to read this responsibly

If you want to look into this more without getting lost in pure speculation:

  • Prioritize reputable outlets summarizing the files and distinguishing sworn statements from uncorroborated claims.
  • Treat any reference to “cannibalism network” or fully proven ritual cannibalism as unverified unless backed by actual evidence, not just one redacted victim account.
  • Be prepared for extremely disturbing content; much of this material involves graphic abuse of minors and should be approached with caution.

So: yes , there is a specific, graphic allegation in the Epstein-related files that involves the consumption of material taken from human bodies, which people are calling “cannibalism,” but there is no conclusive proof in the public record that an organized cannibalism practice has been legally established or verified within Epstein’s network.

Is your main interest here to understand the legal reality (what’s actually proven) or more the cultural/online reaction and conspiracy angle around these cannibalism claims?