Stefon Diggs has been charged with felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault after an allegation that he slapped and choked his live‑in private chef during a dispute over payment; these claims have not been proven in court and he denies them. The alleged incident involves a single unnamed woman who worked as his private chef, and her name has been redacted from police and court documents, so she is not publicly identified.

What actually happened?

  • Court records in Massachusetts state that Diggs is accused of slapping his private chef and then trying to choke her using his arm around her neck during an argument about money on 2 December 2025.
  • The woman reported that she had trouble breathing and felt she might black out, and she later went to police and filed a complaint, which led to the felony strangulation and assault charges.

Who is the alleged victim?

  • Reports describe the alleged victim as a woman who had been working as Diggs’ live‑in or private chef at his home; her name is censored or omitted in public police reports and news coverage.
  • Because she is not named, there is no public answer such as “he strangled X person”; legally and ethically, she is referred to only as his private chef or the alleged victim.

Legal status and presumption of innocence

  • Diggs’ attorney has publicly said that he “categorically denies” the allegations, calling them the result of a financial dispute and saying they “did not occur.”
  • As of the latest reporting, the case is pending, with an arraignment scheduled where Diggs will enter a plea; he is legally presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

Why wording like “who did he strangle” is tricky

  • The charge is that he attempted to choke/strangle the woman; describing it as a proven fact overstates what is currently an allegation, not an established court finding.
  • For search or news purposes, safer wording would be “allegations that Stefon Diggs strangled his private chef” rather than “who did he strangle,” because the victim is unnamed and the case is unresolved.

Quick FAQ style wrap‑up

  • Who is the person involved? His unnamed private chef, described only as an adult woman who worked in his home.
  • Did he actually strangle someone? The woman alleges that he tried to choke her with his arm; Diggs denies this, and a court has not ruled on the facts yet.
  • Is there a public identity for her? No, her name is redacted or omitted in all major public reports so far.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.