there are rivers in the sky review
There Are Rivers in the Sky by Elif Shafak is a lyrical, research‑rich historical novel that uses water as a unifying thread to connect three lives across centuries, from the ancient Tigris to modern‑day London on the Thames.
Quick Scoop
- Type: Literary / historical novel with magical‑realist touches.
- Author: Elif Shafak.
- Vibe: Poetic, slow‑burn, emotional, very atmospheric.
- Structure: Multiple POVs and timelines, all linked through a single droplet of water and the motif of rivers, rain, and snow.
- Best for: Readers who like beautiful prose, deep themes, and character‑driven stories more than fast plots.
What the Book Is About
- The novel follows several protagonists in different eras, including Arthur, born in extreme poverty on the banks of the Thames in Victorian London, with an abusive, alcoholic father.
- Another key figure is Zaleekhah, a hydrologist in 2018 London who moves onto a houseboat on the Thames after a broken marriage and reconnects with her homeland.
- Across thousands of years, the story also touches the ancient city of Nineveh and the River Tigris, bringing in themes of empire, war, and cultural memory.
- All these lives are literally and metaphorically linked by a droplet of water that becomes rain and snow and travels between rivers, carrying the imprint of the people it has touched.
Many reviewers describe it as “poetry in action” and “a dazzling feat of storytelling” that spans continents, cultures, and history through the lens of water.
Themes and Tone
- Interconnectedness & time: The book emphasizes how lives across centuries are bound together, so readers can almost imagine their own life as another point of view in the chain.
- Water & environment: Water is both a narrative device and a theme—touching on climate, rivers, and how landscapes shape people.
- History & violence: The story incorporates real historical trauma, including genocide and persecution of the Yazidi, poverty, and domestic abuse.
- Loneliness & belonging: Zaleekhah’s divorce, Arthur’s childhood, and the broader cast highlight displacement, heartbreak, and the search for connection.
The overall tone is lyrical but heavy at times: there is beauty and hope, but also pain, injustice, and harsh historical truths.
Writing Style and Reading Experience
- The prose is frequently described as lyrical, poetic, and full of vivid imagery that “paints pictures” of both squalid London and dazzling Istanbul.
- Reviewers say it flows “like water,” with steady pacing and a strong sense of atmosphere rather than breakneck plot twists.
- The multi‑POV structure slowly weaves the characters together, rewarding patient readers who enjoy seeing connections gradually revealed.
- Many readers highlight beautifully crafted sentences and inventive metaphors that reframe everyday things (like silence) in striking ways.
For some, the rich prose and density of research make it deeply immersive; for others, it can feel slow or less subtle than Shafak’s very best work.
Strengths vs. Weaknesses
| Aspect | What People Praise | What Some Criticize |
|---|---|---|
| Story & structure | Ingenious use of a water droplet to link three very different lives and eras; feels epic and intimate at once. | [3][1]Not a fast‑paced story; readers wanting traditional, linear plots may find it slow. | [3]
| Characters | Diverse, well‑developed cast with distinct voices; strong emotional vulnerability. | [7][3]Some secondary “bad” characters (e.g., the alcoholic father) could be more deeply explored and nuanced. | [8]
| Prose | Highly lyrical, quotable, “poetry in action,” with powerful imagery. | [6][2][1][3]A few readers feel the author’s hand is visible and occasionally less subtle than in earlier works. | [8]
| Research & history | Impeccable research seamlessly woven into the narrative without feeling like a lecture. | [6][1][7][3]Because it holds so much history and context, it can feel dense if you prefer lighter, plot‑only reads. | [7][3]
| Emotional impact | Many readers call it moving, unforgettable, and one of their favourite reads of the year. | [9][1][3]Contains substantial pain, including abuse and violence, which can be emotionally heavy. | [5][7]
Forum and Community Buzz
- Early reviewers and bloggers describe it as “mesmerizing,” “unique,” and an “unforgettable story,” often listing it among top reads of the year.
- Comment sections and forum‑style replies are generally enthusiastic, praising how knowledgeable and thoughtful the reviews are.
- On reader forums, people note the mix of timelines (Tigris vs. Thames, ancient vs. modern) and talk about how the water motif makes them reflect on their own place in history.
- Booktubers highlight it as a new favourite, especially for fans who already love Shafak’s blend of politics, history, and intimate character work.
A recurring reaction is that it makes statistics and historical atrocities feel personal again by focusing on individual stories rather than numbers.
Should You Read It?
You’ll probably love There Are Rivers in the Sky if you:
- Enjoy multiple timelines and interconnected POVs.
- Like prose that’s beautiful and reflective, even if it slows the pace.
- Are interested in rivers, climate, history, exile, and how ordinary lives intersect with big events.
You might bounce off it if you:
- Want a straightforward, fast plot with minimal description.
- Prefer very subtle authorial presence and less overtly crafted metaphors.
TL;DR: There Are Rivers in the Sky is a richly researched, poetic, multi‑timeline novel that uses water to connect lives from ancient Nineveh to modern London; beloved by many for its imagery and emotional depth, but best suited to readers who enjoy slow, lyrical, historically grounded fiction.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.