Most of what “Andrew said about Kate” comes from anonymous sources and royal commentators, not from Andrew speaking on the record, so everything should be treated as unconfirmed gossip rather than solid fact.

Quick context

  • The “Andrew” in this discussion is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), and “Kate” is Catherine, Princess of Wales.
  • Recent coverage links alleged comments about Kate to a long‑running feud between Andrew and Prince William, especially as Andrew has lost titles, status, and housing in the royal reshuffle.

What he reportedly said/thinks

Different outlets and “insiders” describe his views in slightly different ways, but the main repeated claims are:

  • He allegedly used disparaging or “rude” language about Kate, which royal writers describe as snobbish and disrespectful, suggesting he did not see her as “aristocratic enough” to marry William.
  • One report says he has labeled her a “silent assassin” who is “pulling the strings” with William and helping drive decisions that left him sidelined from royal life.
  • Sources also say he believes Kate has “poisoned the well” against him, turning William and others in the family more firmly against his return to public royal duties.

None of these pieces quote a direct, on‑the‑record line from Andrew; they are second‑hand characterizations attributed to unnamed insiders or royal experts.

Why this turned into a feud

Commentators link the alleged remarks about Kate to deeper tensions:

  • Several royal biographers and experts say Andrew is jealous of Kate’s popularity and “prominence and poise” at a time when his own reputation has collapsed.
  • They report that William, who is described as fiercely protective of Kate, was “infuriated” and adopted a “zero‑tolerance policy” toward Andrew’s behavior and scandals after hearing of the comments.
  • Some sources say William has pushed hard behind the scenes to ensure Andrew loses his remaining privileges, including royal titles and residence, seeing him as a liability to the monarchy.

How forums and gossip frame it

Online royal‑watching communities and tabloid‑style coverage tend to dramatize this into a simple villain/hero narrative:

  • Headlines and forum posts cast Kate as the “perfect villain” in Andrew’s mind, someone he supposedly blames for his exile and treats as “poison,” even though she is widely portrayed as one of the most popular royals.
  • Others flip the framing, painting Andrew as the bitter “fallen prince,” whose alleged envy and snobbish comments about Kate have only deepened his isolation from senior royals.

Important caveats

  • These stories rely heavily on unnamed “sources,” “insiders,” and royal commentators, which means details can be exaggerated, incomplete, or speculative. They should not be taken as a transcript of what Andrew literally said.
  • Publicly verifiable information is mostly about outcomes (loss of titles, housing changes, formal distancing from royal duties), while the specific phrases and insults about Kate are largely reported through gossip‑style channels and commentary.

TL;DR: Reports claim Andrew has made rude, snobbish, and jealous remarks about Kate—calling her a manipulative, behind‑the‑scenes force influencing William and blaming her for his sidelining—but these are unverified insider accounts, not confirmed public quotes.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.