Ben Shapiro recently criticized Megyn Kelly in very direct terms, mainly accusing her of moral cowardice for not forcefully denouncing Candace Owens and what he sees as toxic elements on the right at a Turning Point USA/“AmericaFest”-type event. Megyn Kelly, in turn, has publicly blasted his comments as a betrayal from a friend and has argued that he is unfairly policing what other conservatives must say and how they must handle criticisms of Israel and antisemitism.

What Shapiro Said About Kelly

Shapiro’s remarks came in the context of a broader warning that the conservative movement is in serious peril from “charlatans” and people peddling conspiracies and venom. Within that warning, he singled out Megyn Kelly (along with others like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon) for what he framed as a failure to denounce Candace Owens’ rhetoric and behavior.

Key points of what he said about Megyn Kelly included:

  • He grouped her with figures he believes have “failed to denounce” Owens’ “vicious attacks,” suggesting this failure contributes to a dangerous direction on the right.
  • In follow‑up commentary and coverage, he has been described as effectively calling Kelly a coward for not taking a clearer public stand, casting his criticism as “moral leadership” in the face of antisemitism and conspiracy content.
  • He framed his call‑out as part of drawing a line between responsible conservative voices and those enabling or platforming harmful ideas, using Kelly as one example of someone not doing enough, in his view, to police their own side.

How Megyn Kelly Responded

Kelly responded quickly and forcefully, both from the same event stage and in later media appearances, saying Shapiro’s comments blindsided her. She emphasized that she had long treated him as a friend and had helped elevate his profile earlier in his career.

Her response included:

  • She said she was “flabbergasted” and described the attack as feeling like a betrayal , noting that she had just given him a warm, extended introduction and had helped “make him a star” years ago at Fox News.
  • She argued that Shapiro and likeminded commentators are actually fueling antisemitism by trying to shut down or delegitimize criticism of Israel, insisting that Tucker Carlson (whom Shapiro also criticized) is not to blame for rising antisemitism.
  • On stage and in subsequent clips, she painted his demand that she denounce Owens as an attempt at gatekeeping and de‑platforming, which she sees as contrary to the free‑speech ethos many conservatives claim to support.

Why This Is a Trending Topic

The clash has become a mini‑drama inside the conservative media world, and that drives a lot of forum and social‑media discussion. It taps into several hot‑button themes in late 2025:

  • Right‑wing infighting: Commentators and users see this as part of a wider “splintering” on the right over Israel, antisemitism, and relations with fringe or alt‑right figures.
  • Questions of loyalty vs. principle: Some praise Shapiro for confronting a friend, arguing that moral lines should trump personal ties, while others see it as performative and divisive, especially given Kelly’s role in boosting his career.
  • Audience and brand battles: Commentators note that both Kelly and Shapiro are major media brands competing for influence, and the rift plays out like a public struggle for who defines the “mainstream” conservative lane.

Different Viewpoints People Are Taking

Online discussions and commentary break down roughly into a few camps:

  1. Pro‑Shapiro view
    • Kelly is accused of “playing dumb” or soft‑pedaling extremism by not clearly disavowing Owens or similar figures.
 * Supporters say Shapiro took a necessary stand against antisemitic or conspiratorial content, even at the cost of a friendship.
  1. Pro‑Kelly view
    • Shapiro is portrayed as grandstanding, picking a public fight with an ally to appear morally superior and shore up his own brand.
 * These voices highlight that Kelly helped launch him at Fox and argue his attack shows ingratitude and an eagerness to police speech on the right.
  1. “Everyone looks bad” view
    • Some commentators see the feud as emblematic of a conservative media ecosystem cannibalizing itself in public, with competing influencers using moral disputes as content and clout battles.
 * They argue the focus has shifted from policy or principles to personal beefs, algorithm‑friendly drama, and audience segmentation.

Quick FAQ Style Recap

  • Q: What did Ben Shapiro actually say about Megyn Kelly?
    He lumped her in with figures he says failed to denounce Candace Owens’ “vicious attacks,” presenting that as moral cowardice and part of a broader problem inside the conservative movement.
  • Q: How did Megyn Kelly characterize it?
    She called it a betrayal by a friend, insisted she helped build his career, and argued he and others are going too far in demanding denunciations and suppressing criticism of Israel.
  • Q: Why are people online talking about this so much?
    It symbolizes a larger rift on the right over antisemitism, Israel, “platforming,” and who gets to define responsible conservatism, all playing out between high‑profile media personalities.

Meta description:
Curious what Ben Shapiro said about Megyn Kelly? Here’s a concise breakdown of his criticism, her fiery response, and why their feud is now a major trending topic on the right.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.