Here’s the quick scoop on what Joe Rogan has been saying about Jimmy Kimmel, especially around the recent “Kimmel suspension” drama and Rogan’s broader criticism of late‑night TV.

What Did Joe Rogan Say About Jimmy Kimmel?

The Core of Rogan’s Comments

Rogan has talked about Kimmel in two main ways:

  1. as a symbol of corporate, politically driven late‑night TV , and
  2. as a comedian caught up in a government‑pressure controversy over what he said on air.

In older riffs, Rogan criticized Kimmel’s show as over‑scripted, teleprompter‑dependent, and politically repetitive, saying it turned into “just talking bad about Trump” instead of organic comedy.

More recently, during Kimmel’s suspension after comments about the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Rogan actually defended Kimmel on free‑speech grounds and blasted conservatives who cheered the punishment.

1. Rogan’s Critique of Kimmel’s Comedy and Show Style

In several podcast segments, Rogan paints Kimmel as the prototype of network‑approved late‑night: polished, safe, and tightly controlled by writers and executives.

Key things Rogan has said or argued about Kimmel and shows like his:

  • Kimmel reads from a teleprompter
    • Rogan says late‑night hosts like Kimmel are mostly “reading off a teleprompter” while joke‑writers do the real creative heavy lifting.
* He contrasts that with long‑form, unscripted podcast conversation, which he calls more “human” and less manufactured.
  • Formulaic, audience‑pandering humor
    • Rogan argues that Kimmel’s monologues often feel like calculated political takes designed to please a particular audience instead of genuine, risk‑taking comedy.
* He’s criticized the heavy reliance on applause signs, curated studio audiences, and network‑friendly topics, saying that creates a forced atmosphere.
  • Shift from edgy comic to corporate host
    • Commentary around Rogan’s take notes that he’s accused Kimmel of evolving from an edgier, “Man Show”‑era comedian to a safe, corporate late‑night figure aligned with Hollywood consensus politics.
* Clips and breakdowns of Rogan’s remarks emphasize that he sees Kimmel as an example of how late‑night “lost its edge” and became another arm of mainstream narratives.
  • “Hollywood bubble” and politics
    • Rogan has highlighted what he and many fans view as Kimmel’s “Hollywood bubble” perspective, with heavy anti‑Trump focus and social‑issue lecturing dominating his monologues.
* In these segments, Rogan’s tone is mocking and dismissive, framing Kimmel as a performer speaking **for** a particular political tribe instead of as an independent comic.

2. The Suspension Controversy: Rogan Defends Kimmel’s Right to Joke

The more surprising part for some fans is that when Kimmel was briefly taken off the air after a monologue involving comments about the alleged murderer of Charlie Kirk, Rogan did not pile on.

What happened with Kimmel

  • Disney’s ABC temporarily pulled “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” after Kimmel made remarks tying the shooter’s political stance into a joke connected to Donald Trump and MAGA politics.
  • Critics argued he mischaracterized the shooter’s politics; backlash from conservatives and political pressure from the Trump administration followed, and the show went on a short hiatus.

What Rogan actually said

Rogan’s take on that situation was much more about principle than about liking or disliking Kimmel:

  • Against government‑driven punishment
    • Rogan said he “definitely” does not think the government should be involved in deciding what a comedian can or cannot say in a monologue.
* He warned that if companies like ABC are being pressured by the government and conservatives cheer that on, they are “crazy” because that same tool can later be used against them.
  • Acknowledged Kimmel was factually off, but defended the joke as a joke
    • Rogan noted that Kimmel’s statement about the shooter’s political stance “wasn’t accurate,” but described it as part of the setup to what he considered a “very funny” joke about Trump’s reaction to Kirk’s death.
* In other words, he separated factual precision from the comedic intent, emphasizing that comedians play with exaggeration and framing to land a punchline.
  • Warning conservatives about censorship backfiring
    • Rogan criticized right‑wing figures who wanted Kimmel punished, saying backing government‑driven pressure on speech is “insane” and would inevitably be turned on their own side later.
* This fits Rogan’s long‑standing skepticism of censorship and government involvement in media, even when he doesn’t like the specific comic or joke.

3. Rogan vs. Kimmel: The Bigger Picture

Rogan’s comments about Kimmel aren’t just personal shots; they reflect a broader contrast he likes to draw between podcasts and network late‑night.

How Rogan frames the contrast

  • Authentic vs. scripted
    • Rogan: long, raw, unscripted conversations with no network filters, no hard commercial breaks, and very little editing.
* Kimmel: short, tightly structured segments with writers, producers, standards departments, and advertisers all shaping what goes on air.
  • Freedom vs. constraints
    • Rogan emphasizes that he doesn’t answer to a network or advertisers in the same way, which he says gives him creative freedom but also heavy responsibility.
* He portrays Kimmel as bound by corporate and broadcast rules, which he says makes the show cautious, predictable, and focused on safe political targets.
  • Cultural “old guard” vs. new media
    • In many commentaries, Kimmel is described as representing the “old guard” of late‑night TV, while Rogan is framed as part of the new, unfiltered, streaming‑driven media world.
* This framing is central to why their dust‑ups go viral: fans see it as a clash between Hollywood establishment and outsider podcast culture.

4. How Fans and Forums Are Talking About It

Online discussions and reaction videos have amplified every Rogan jab and every perceived Kimmel misstep, turning it into a running culture‑war storyline.

Common themes in forum and commentary chatter:

  • Rogan fans
    • Say he “called it” years ago about Kimmel becoming a corporate, politically safe host.
* Applaud Rogan for defending free speech even for someone he mocks, viewing that as proof he’s consistent on censorship issues.
  • Kimmel defenders
    • Argue that late‑night has always mixed politics and comedy and see Kimmel as “speaking truth to power” from a mainstream platform.
* Criticize Rogan for oversimplifying how network TV works and for boosting guests and narratives they see as harmful or one‑sided.
  • Mixed / skeptical takes
    • Some posters suggest both men benefit from the feud: Rogan strengthens his anti‑Hollywood brand, while Kimmel’s clashes with big conservative figures keep him relevant online.
* Others complain that Rogan’s show has become more about his own opinions than about letting guests talk, even when he’s technically defending someone he usually criticizes.

5. So, in One Line: What Did Rogan Say About Kimmel?

Putting it simply:

  • Rogan has mocked Jimmy Kimmel as a scripted, politically pandering, corporate late‑night host who lost his edgy comedy roots, contrasting that with his own “raw” podcast style.
  • At the same time, during Kimmel’s suspension over a controversial monologue, Rogan defended Kimmel’s right to joke, condemned government pressure on his show, and called conservatives who cheered the crackdown “crazy” because censorship can be turned on anyone.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.