Kevin Gates went viral in 2022 for saying that women with acne supposedly have “the best” sex, and that their breakouts are linked to “hormones” and “congestion” in their bodies.

What Kevin Gates Actually Said

Kevin Gates made these comments in an interview when asked about his experiences in the bedroom.

  • He claimed that “a lot of women with acne on their face got good [sex]” because their hormones are “imbalanced” and they have “all the congestion.”
  • He went further and suggested that after being intimate with him, a woman’s skin started to clear up.
  • The tone was clearly sexual and provocative, more like shock-value talk than a serious medical statement.

How People Reacted

The comments were widely mocked and criticized online as another off-the-wall Kevin Gates quote.

  • Entertainment shows joked that he “will say anything,” treating it as a wild, unserious take rather than a fact.
  • Social media and forum discussions framed it as fetishizing acne and spreading pseudo-scientific ideas about hormones and skin.

Is There Any Truth To It?

From a health perspective, his explanation does not line up with dermatology or endocrinology.

  • Acne can be influenced by hormones, but there is no evidence that sexual performance or specific partners “clear” acne.
  • Dermatologists generally recommend evidence-based treatments like topical retinoids, oral medications, and lifestyle adjustments, not sexual activity, to manage acne.

Why It Became a Trending Topic

The clip fit into a pattern of Kevin Gates making extreme, intimate, and shock-oriented statements that easily go viral.

  • The mix of sex, appearance (acne), and pseudo-science made it a perfect storm for memes, stitches, and reaction videos.
  • Radio and podcast hosts used it as a talking point to debate body image, insecurity, and how celebrities talk about women’s looks.

TL;DR: Kevin Gates said women with acne have the “best” sex and claimed their hormones and “congestion” were the reason, even suggesting sex with him could clear their skin; the remarks were treated as viral shock talk, not as anything medically credible.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.