Trump has made several recent posts and reposts on X through his official @POTUS account, but there is no single, clear “most recent” controversial post on X itself that fully defines “what did Trump post on X” right now. Instead, the attention is split between his routine reposts of White House events and a separate, highly controversial racist video he shared on social media that has sparked major backlash.

what did trump post on x?

Quick Scoop on the latest news and forum discussion

Meta note: There is no one master feed of “everything Trump just posted” that is perfectly indexed in real time, and some controversy is coming from another platform but is being discussed heavily on X. Below is the clearest snapshot from public sources as of early February 2026.

1. The straightforward part: his official X posts

On X, the account @POTUS (President Donald J. Trump) is active and mostly amplifying official White House content.

Recent examples:

  • He reposted a White House post titled “President Trump Makes an Announcement, Feb. 5, 2026 (LIVE)” with tens of thousands of views and hundreds of interactions.
  • He reposted a White House live stream, “President Trump Participates in a Bill Signing, Feb. 3, 2026” , again mainly a promotional, official event-style post.
  • Another repost promoted “President Trump Participates in Signing Time, Feb. 2, 2026” as a live event.

So if you literally ask “what did Trump post on X” in the narrow sense, a lot of it is:

  • Live announcement streams
  • Bill signings and ceremonial events
  • Standard “here’s the President doing something official” clips and reposts via the @WhiteHouse account

This is the routine, official posting pattern: mostly government stagecraft, little raw commentary.

2. The messy part: the racist video and why everyone is talking

What’s actually trending and driving forum discussion is not a simple X text post, but a video Trump shared on his social media that is being debated heavily on X and in the broader news cycle.

Key points:

  • Trump shared a video that included a racist animation depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as apes, alongside debunked claims about the 2020 election.
  • The post was later deleted , but only after bipartisan criticism, including from some Republicans.
  • On Air Force One, Trump said he only saw the “first part” about election fraud and did not fully review the racist imagery, and he indicated he did not plan to apologize.
  • Aides say a staffer posted it “by mistake,” which is the internal justification for its removal.

So when people online ask, “What did Trump post on X?” they might really be referring to:

  • The racist Obama video story , which is being dissected and reshared on X.
  • The broader pattern of posts that echo conspiracy theories and grievance politics.

Even though the original racist video is gone, X is where:

  • Clips, screenshots, and reactions are going viral.
  • Politicians and commentators are debating what it says about Trump and his administration.

3. How forums and watchers track “Trump on X”

Because Trump still posts heavily on Truth Social , several hobbyist accounts and tools exist to mirror or republish his content into X-style feeds.

A few examples:

  • One developer project explains how they recreate Trump’s Truth Social feed on X by:
    • Hunting down corresponding X accounts
    • Crossposting similar content
    • Combining multi-part Truth Social posts into one longer X-style text
    • Even converting unsupported video formats so they can be posted on X
  • The profile described as “Trump Posts on 𝕏” advertises itself as “Recreating your favorite president Donald J. Trump’s Truth Social feed using 𝕏 users & posts when possible”, with tens of thousands of followers.
  • Another account focuses on “Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social,” again turning Truth Social posts into X-style content and discussion fodder.

These projects matter because:

  • They blur the line between “what Trump posted on Truth Social” and “what people see as Trump content on X.”
  • Forum threads often quote or screenshot these reposts , then talk as if Trump posted directly on X, even when the original was elsewhere.

4. Wider context: state messaging, censorship worries, and narrative

control

There’s also a bigger structural story around Trump, social media, and controlling public records that influences how people read his X presence.

Recent development:

  • The State Department decided to remove from public view all posts on X from before Trump’s return to office on January 20, 2025. These posts are archived internally but no longer visible to the public.
  • This includes posts from Trump’s first term , Joe Biden , and Barack Obama , meaning a large chunk of historical diplomatic messaging is effectively hidden unless someone files a formal records request.
  • This move fits into a broader pattern of removing or rewriting online information that contradicts the administration’s line, including:
    • Environmental and health data
    • References to marginalized groups
    • Information about Trump’s impeachments and earlier presidency

Why this matters for “what did Trump post on X”:

  • It underscores the idea that content is governance : social media isn’t just PR; it’s treated as a core part of policy and power.
  • It also means that what you see on X (or don’t see) is increasingly curated to match the “America First” messaging that the administration wants.

So the visible X feed is:

  • Heavy on official events and stage-managed appearances
  • Surrounded by a wider ecosystem of reposted Truth Social content and erased historical posts
  • Intersecting with flashpoints like the racist Obama video , even if the original was elsewhere

5. Multiple viewpoints: how people are reacting

Reactions to Trump’s recent posts and the broader pattern of his online behavior break down roughly into a few camps.

  1. Supporters’ view
    • See his posts (and reposts) as direct communication with the public, bypassing what they consider biased media.
    • Treat the video controversy as either overblown, a staff error, or another attack on Trump.
  1. Critical conservatives’ view
    • Some Republicans publicly called the racist video “the most racist thing I’ve seen out of this White House” and urged removal.
 * They frame it as a serious lapse in judgment that distracts from policy and damages the party.
  1. Democrats and civil rights advocates’ view
    • See the video—and the broader content strategy—as openly racist , dehumanizing, and part of a pattern of extremism.
 * Point to the wiping of government social-media archives and the amplification of conspiracy rhetoric as evidence of authoritarian-style narrative control.
  1. Media and governance-watch view
    • Focus less on one post and more on how Trump’s administration uses social media as a primary tool of diplomacy, propaganda, and historical revision.
 * Highlight that agencies under Trump have pushed or echoed **white supremacist rhetoric and QAnon content** in some posts, which is highly unusual for official government channels.

6. So, if someone on a forum asks: “What did Trump post on X?”

A concise, shareable way to answer right now could be:

  • On X itself, Trump’s @POTUS feed is mostly reposts of official White House livestreams and events from early February 2026.
  • The real storm is around a racist video of the Obamas that he shared on social media (not necessarily originally on X), which has been deleted after intense backlash but is still dominating X discussions and news coverage.
  • Around that, the administration is aggressively managing online records and messaging, including wiping pre-2025 State Department X posts from public view and promoting an “America First” narrative as the central theme of government social media.

TL;DR:
Trump’s current visible X output is mostly official-looking reposts of White House events, but the online discourse is consumed by a deleted racist video of the Obamas he shared on social media and by growing concern over how his administration is using social platforms—both to push conspiracy-heavy, racially charged messaging and to erase or rewrite older government content.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.