In mid-January 2026, Donald Trump sent an unusually sharp message to Norway’s prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre, complaining about not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize and tying that grievance to U.S. policy toward Greenland and Europe.

What Trump said about Norway

  • Trump told Støre he “no longer feels an obligation to think purely of peace” because Norway’s Nobel system did not give him the Nobel Peace Prize, even though he claimed to have “stopped” or “halted” multiple wars.
  • He framed this as Norway’s “decision” not to award him, despite the fact that the Norwegian Nobel Committee is formally independent of the Norwegian government.
  • In the same communication, he linked his frustration over the Nobel Peace Prize to hardline positions on tariffs against European countries and to his push for “complete and total control of Greenland,” arguing world security depended on U.S. control of the island.

How Norway responded

  • Prime minister Støre reiterated that the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by an independent committee, not by the Norwegian government, and that Oslo cannot decide who wins it.
  • Norwegian and other European officials expressed concern because Trump’s message came amid threats of new tariffs and his renewed challenge to Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland, which raised alarms inside NATO.

Forum and public reaction

  • On major forums and social media discussions, many users described the message as petty or dangerous, criticizing the idea of linking personal disappointment over a prize to statements about peace, Greenland, and tariffs.
  • Commenters also pointed out that Trump appeared to ignore or reject repeated explanations that Norway does not directly control the Nobel Committee, even as he publicly insisted that Norway “really” controls the process.

Why this is trending now

  • The story is trending because it combines several hot-button issues in 2026: Trump’s ongoing fixation on the Nobel Peace Prize, tensions inside NATO, debates over Arctic security and Greenland, and concern about whether personal grievances are shaping U.S. foreign policy.
  • News outlets have highlighted the episode as another example of Trump personalizing diplomacy, while forums are using it as a springboard to argue about his broader fitness for office and the risk to U.S.–European relations.

TL;DR: Trump told Norway’s prime minister he no longer feels bound to “think purely of peace” because he did not get the Nobel Peace Prize, and he tied that complaint to threats over Greenland and tariffs on European countries, prompting criticism and concern in Norway, Europe, and online discussions.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.