what did trump say about soldiers

Donald Trump has made a wide range of comments about soldiers and the military over the years, including both strong praise and remarks that sparked serious backlash.

H1: What did Trump say about soldiers?

Trump’s record includes:

• Public praise of U.S. troops and veterans as heroes and the “reason America stands tall.”

• Controversial comments suggesting some allied NATO troops stayed “a little back, a little off the front lines” in Afghanistan, which many leaders and veterans called insulting and inaccurate.

• A long‑running controversy over reports that he privately referred to fallen U.S. service members as “losers” and “suckers,” which he has publicly denied but which continues to fuel debate.

These mixed statements are why “what did Trump say about soldiers” keeps returning as a trending topic and forum discussion point.

H2: Positive remarks Trump has made about soldiers

Trump has often used very admiring language about American troops at rallies, ceremonies, and military events.

Key themes in his praise :

• Describing soldiers and veterans as the reason America “stands tall” centuries after the founding of its armed forces.

• Emphasizing that U.S. soldiers “never give up, never surrender and never ever quit,” portraying them as relentless and victorious.

• Highlighting sacrifices from the Revolutionary War through modern conflicts like Afghanistan, and saluting Gold Star families for their loss.

“Our soldiers never give up, never surrender and never ever quit. They fight and they win.”

These types of remarks are often cited by his supporters to argue that he deeply respects the military.

H2: The “losers” and “suckers” controversy

One of the most debated topics in forums when people ask “what did Trump say about soldiers” is the allegation that he privately insulted fallen troops.

Core points:

1. Media report
   • A major article in 2020 reported that Trump allegedly referred to Americans who died in war as “losers” and “suckers” during private conversations.

 * The story also tied this attitude to his reported difficulty understanding why someone would serve or die in combat without a clear personal benefit.

2. Trump’s denial
   • Trump publicly and repeatedly denied ever calling fallen soldiers “losers” or “suckers,” calling the report false and politically motivated.

 * His allies have echoed this denial, while critics say the alleged quotes fit a broader pattern of how he speaks about service and sacrifice.

3. Forum and supporter debates
   • On political forums, some Trump supporters argue the quotes are taken out of context or fabricated.

 * Critics cite the alleged remarks as disqualifying for a commander in chief, especially given the sensitivity around military graves and families of the fallen.

Because the key phrases come from anonymous sources rather than on-camera footage, the argument about what he “really said” is still active and polarized.

H2: Recent remarks about NATO soldiers and Afghanistan

In early 2026, Trump again triggered backlash with new comments about allied soldiers in the Afghanistan war.

What he said:

• Trump claimed that NATO allies “sent some troops” but that they “stayed a little back, a little off the front lines” in Afghanistan.

• He questioned whether NATO countries would be there for the U.S. if America truly needed them, saying he doubted they would respond as reliably as the U.S. responds for them.

Why this was controversial:

• Leaders in the UK and other NATO countries called his description “wrong” and “an insult” to the hundreds of allied troops killed and thousands wounded in Afghanistan.

• Officials emphasized that British and other NATO soldiers did fight and die on the front lines, and that suggesting otherwise disrespects their sacrifice.

• Veterans and public figures, including Prince Harry, stressed that allied troops’ sacrifices deserve respectful, accurate acknowledgment, not minimization.

This episode added a new chapter to the broader question of how Trump talks about soldiers—especially non‑U.S. ones.

H3: How supporters vs critics interpret his words

Because your question overlaps with a trending political topic, a lot of the discussion now happens in forums and comment sections.

Supporters often argue:

• Trump “tells it like it is” about foreign policy and NATO burden sharing, even if it sounds harsh.

• His public praise at parades, speeches, and veteran events shows he respects U.S. troops.

• Allegations about insults (“losers,” “suckers”) are either fabricated or taken out of context by opponents and unfriendly media.

Critics often argue:

• The alleged private comments about fallen soldiers, combined with remarks questioning “what was in it for them,” reveal a transactional view of service.

• Statements minimizing allied troops’ frontline roles in Afghanistan undermine alliances and disrespect the dead and wounded.

• Even when he praises troops, his other comments make it hard to see that praise as consistently respectful.

H2: Quick HTML table of key episodes

Below is an HTML table summarizing some of the most discussed Trump remarks about soldiers:

[1] [1] [8][1] [10][4] [4][10] [6][10][4] [5][9][3][7] [3][5][7] [9][7][3]

Episode	Approx. date	What Trump said (summary)	Reaction
Military parade praise	June 2025	Praised U.S. soldiers as heroes, said they “never give up, never surrender,” and credited them with keeping America standing strong.	Generally positive among supporters; cited as evidence he honors the troops.
“Losers” and “suckers” allegation	Story broke in 2020, debated for years after	Reportedly called fallen U.S. troops “losers” and “suckers” in private; Trump publicly denied ever saying this.	Major controversy; critics saw it as deeply disrespectful, supporters questioned the credibility of anonymous sources.
Afghanistan NATO/frontline comments	January 2026	Claimed allied NATO troops “stayed a little back, a little off the front lines” in Afghanistan and questioned whether NATO would show up for the U.S.	Strong backlash from UK and other allies; veterans and leaders called the claim false and insulting to troops who died fighting.

H2: If you’re following this as “latest news”

Because this topic is active and politically charged, details and emphasis can shift as new statements, interviews, or investigations emerge.

If you’re reading or posting on forums:

• Check whether a quote is on video, in an official transcript, or from unnamed sources; that changes how people judge it.

• Expect very different interpretations depending on whether the poster is pro‑Trump, anti‑Trump, or mainly focused on veterans’ issues.

• Remember that for families of soldiers, especially those killed or wounded, language about “front lines,” “sacrifice,” and “what was in it for them” can feel intensely personal.

Bottom note: Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.