Whoopi Goldberg has recently spoken about Charlie Kirk in the context of condemning his assassination and calling for an end to political violence in America.

What Did Whoopi Goldberg Say About Charlie?

Quick Scoop

In the days after conservative commentator and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a college event in Utah, Whoopi Goldberg used her platform on The View to call the killing “beyond devastating” and to denounce political violence from any side.

On air, she:

  • Expressed condolences to Kirk’s family and loved ones.
  • Called the assassination “beyond devastating” for American discourse.
  • Emphasized that Americans should be able to share their opinions “without fear” and “without this kind of horror happening.”
  • Warned that targeting people for their beliefs is a dangerous trend affecting both left and right.

Her Message on Free Speech and Violence

Goldberg framed Kirk’s death as a crisis point for free speech and democratic norms.

Key ideas she pushed:

  • No one should be afraid to speak in America because of their views.
  • Political violence is unacceptable whether the victim is a conservative activist like Kirk or historic figures such as Kennedy, Lincoln, or Garfield.
  • It is wrong to think that “taking somebody out” will stop their message.

She drew a line from Kirk’s assassination to other recent incidents of political violence, arguing that it is part of a broader pattern that threatens how Americans debate and disagree.

Direct Words to “Assassins”

On a later episode, Goldberg addressed Kirk’s killer and would-be assassins more broadly with a very pointed message.

She said things along the lines of:

  • It is “awful” whenever someone is assassinated, regardless of who they are.
  • “Just because you take somebody out doesn’t mean the message is going to stop.”
  • Americans “continue to fight on” after assassinations, which is part of what the country stands for.
  • People are “born with” the right to say and feel what they want; killing people does nothing except make the world worse for their children.

Her core argument: if you want change, you use debate, organizing, and elections—not bullets.

What She Said About How to “Fight”

Goldberg contrasted violence with democratic tools.

She urged people to:

  1. Go to the ballot box – Elect different leaders if you want a new direction.
  1. Use free speech and debate – Argue your case, protest, organize, and try to persuade others.
  1. Reject firearms as a political tool – She explicitly argued that guns should not be the “tool” used in political conflict.

This put her, unusually, in a position where many conservatives felt she was defending the principle of free speech for someone they saw as one of their own, despite her sharp disagreements with Kirk’s politics.

How People Are Talking About It Online

Online forums, comment sections, and political channels have picked up the question “what did Whoopi Goldberg say about Charlie?” because her remarks crossed typical partisan lines.

Recurring themes in discussions:

  • Some viewers praise her for a rare moment of cross-aisle solidarity and a strong stance against political violence.
  • Others remain skeptical of media figures in general, questioning whether this will actually change the tone of public debate.
  • Many highlight her insistence that assassinations never extinguish ideas, seeing it as both a warning and a civic lesson.

In short, when people ask “what did Whoopi Goldberg say about Charlie,” they’re usually referring to her emotional on-air condemnation of his assassination, her condolences to his family, and her broad appeal to reject political violence and use votes—not violence—as the way to fight for change.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.