Russia’s official line is that Greenland is legally part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and that any talk of taking it over—especially by the United States—is “extraordinary” and risky from the perspective of international law. At the same time, Moscow uses the Greenland issue to criticize NATO militarization in the Arctic and to underline that Russia, as a major Arctic power, has “legitimate interests” in the wider region.

Russia’s core position

  • Russia publicly recognizes Greenland as Danish territory and says it “proceeds from the understanding that Greenland is a territory of the Kingdom of Denmark.”
  • Officials call the current situation around Greenland “unusual” or “extraordinary” under international law, referring to U.S. political talk about acquiring the island.
  • By stressing Danish sovereignty, Moscow presents itself as defending existing borders and treaties against big-power bargaining over territory.

View on U.S. takeover talk

  • Russian spokespeople frame repeated U.S. interest in buying or otherwise taking Greenland as a destabilizing move, not normal diplomacy.
  • They argue that invoking “Russian and Chinese activity” in the Arctic as a justification for U.S. or NATO buildup is just a pretext for escalation.
  • Some Russian and European commentators point out the irony that Moscow, accused of violating international law elsewhere, is now criticizing Washington on legal grounds over Greenland.

Arctic and NATO angle

  • Russia stresses that it is the largest Arctic power and says it has legitimate strategic interests across the region, including the waters and airspace around Greenland.
  • Moscow warns that NATO “militarising Greenland” will have “serious consequences,” and hints at strengthening its own military and technical measures in the Arctic in response.
  • Russian officials also say they are “closely monitoring” the security situation around Greenland, linking it to broader great‑power competition in the high north.

How Russia uses the issue politically

  • By backing Denmark’s legal claim, Russia can sow tension inside NATO: it sides with Copenhagen on sovereignty while criticizing Washington’s rhetoric and pressure.
  • Russian statements often tease or needle Western allies, suggesting Denmark is in a subordinate position to the U.S. and calling for any dispute to be handled through international law.
  • Analysts note that Moscow’s direct material interest in Greenland itself appears limited; the bigger value is using the controversy to highlight Arctic issues and to undermine NATO unity.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.