The Bible mentions same-sex behavior only in a small number of passages, and those passages are interpreted very differently by different Christian traditions today. Many conservative readers see them as straightforward prohibitions on same-sex sexual activity, while many other Christians argue the texts are culturally specific, mistranslated, or not addressing modern consensual same‑sex relationships.

1. Key passages usually cited

Most discussions focus on a short list of verses.

  • Leviticus 18:22 – “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.”
  • Leviticus 20:13 – Repeats the prohibition and in the ancient Israelite law code attaches a death penalty.
  • Romans 1:26–27 – Paul describes men and women “exchanging natural relations” and “men committing shameful acts with men,” linking this to idolatry and rejection of God.
  • 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 – Lists behaviors that “will not inherit the kingdom of God,” including disputed Greek terms often translated “men who have sex with men.”
  • 1 Timothy 1:10 – Includes another similar term in a list of sinful acts.
  • Jude 1:7 – Refers to Sodom and Gomorrah and “sexual immorality,” which many later readers associate with same‑sex behavior, though the text itself emphasizes general sexual violence and excess.

Passages on marriage, such as Genesis 2:24 and Jesus’ words in Mark 10:6–9, present the Bible’s positive sexual ideal as a man and a woman in lifelong, covenantal union, and these are often cited to argue that the Bible’s sexual ethic is intrinsically male–female.

2. Traditional / conservative Christian view

In many evangelical, Catholic, and conservative Protestant churches, the dominant reading looks like this.

  • Same‑sex sexual acts are understood as morally wrong, alongside other forms of sex outside male–female marriage.
  • The Old Testament laws (Leviticus) are seen as expressing a moral principle that is reaffirmed, not cancelled, by the New Testament passages in Romans, 1 Corinthians, and 1 Timothy.
  • Attraction itself is not always treated as sin, but acting on it sexually is; believers are called to chastity (either celibate singleness or male–female marriage).
  • Many of these traditions stress that all people, including LGBTQ people, are made in God’s image and must not be hated, mocked, or harmed; they condemn violence and bullying as un‑Christian even while holding a traditional sexual ethic.

A common modern summary from this perspective is: “The Bible teaches love and respect for every person, but does not permit same‑sex sexual relationships as a faithful Christian pattern of life.”

3. Affirming / revisionist Christian view

Other Christians—including some mainline Protestants, some independent churches, and many theologians—believe committed same‑sex relationships can be compatible with Christian faith.

Typical arguments include:

  • The Bible does not address modern, mutual, committed same‑sex relationships but specific ancient practices such as exploitative pederasty, temple prostitution, or abusive power‑based sex.
  • The Levitical laws belong to Israel’s ritual and cultural code, like food and clothing rules, and are not directly binding on Christians today.
  • The Greek terms in 1 Corinthians 6 and 1 Timothy 1 are rare and possibly mistranslated; they might refer to economic exploitation or abuse rather than orientation‑based relationships.
  • The heart of biblical ethics is love of God and neighbor; therefore, covenanted, loving same‑sex relationships that reflect self‑giving love, fidelity, and justice can be seen as consistent with that core.

From this view, the emphasis falls on the Bible’s overarching themes of justice, mercy, and inclusion rather than on a small number of difficult texts.

4. Pastoral and personal dimensions

Across the spectrum, there is growing recognition that this is not just a theoretical issue but a deeply personal one.

  • Many churches are trying to balance doctrinal convictions with pastoral care—supporting LGBTQ people who are asking, “Am I loved here?”
  • Christian counseling materials emphasize listening, avoiding shaming, and acknowledging that some believers experience lifelong same‑sex attraction and are wrestling with how to live faithfully.
  • Even in communities that hold a non‑affirming position, there is often a shift in tone—from harsh, culture‑war language to a more careful emphasis on repentance, forgiveness, and shared human brokenness, not singling out one group as uniquely sinful.

If you are personally affected by this topic, many Christian groups (both traditional and affirming) now offer support spaces that focus on prayer, mental health, and community rather than just argument.

5. How this shows up in “latest news” and forums

In recent years, debates about what the Bible says on homosexuality have shaped church decisions, online forums, and social media discussions.

  • Major denominations have split or restructured over LGBTQ inclusion and same‑sex marriage, with both sides claiming to be faithful to Scripture.
  • You’ll see recurring online patterns: some posts quote Leviticus or Romans directly; others share personal stories of LGBTQ Christians and argue that lived experience should shape how we interpret those texts.
  • Many guides aimed at general audiences try to summarize “what the Bible says about homosexuality” in simple lists of verses, while others push back and argue that any quick list risks oversimplifying a complex interpretive issue.

In forum discussions, you’ll usually find at least three voices:

  1. “The Bible clearly condemns it,”
  2. “The Bible is being misread; it supports loving same‑sex relationships,” and
  3. “The Bible is ancient and shouldn’t control modern sexual ethics at all.”

TL;DR:

  • The Bible’s explicit texts consistently present same‑sex sexual acts negatively in their original context.
  • Many Christians therefore hold a traditional view: sex is reserved for male–female marriage and same‑sex acts are sinful, while every person must be treated with dignity.
  • Other Christians argue these passages address specific ancient practices, not today’s consensual same‑sex relationships, and that the Bible’s deeper message of love and justice can affirm LGBTQ couples.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.