Jared Kushner’s main qualification is not formal diplomacy; it’s that Donald Trump has chosen him as a trusted political emissary with existing Middle East relationships and experience from the Abraham Accords era. Critics argue that he lacks the usual foreign-policy background, confirmation, and institutional role that typically qualify someone to negotiate with Iran.

What supports him

  • He has prior involvement in major Middle East talks, including Gaza-related diplomacy and the Abraham Accords.
  • Supporters say he can use personal relationships and a business-style negotiating approach to keep channels open.
  • He is acting at Trump’s direction, which gives him political authority inside this administration.

What critics say

  • Former diplomats and analysts say he lacks the expertise and experience normally expected in serious Iran nuclear negotiations.
  • Some lawmakers have questioned why he, rather than the State Department or a Senate-confirmed envoy, is leading the talks.
  • Reported financial conflicts tied to his private business have also raised concerns about credibility and influence.

Straight answer

So, what “qualifies” him is mostly presidential backing and prior access , not a conventional diplomatic résumé. Whether that makes him effective is the disputed part, and the reporting you asked about is largely about that gap.

TL;DR

He’s qualified in the political sense because Trump empowered him and he has Middle East contacts, but he is widely seen as underqualified in the diplomatic-professional sense.