what's the point of ashe since emre exists
Quick Scoop
Ashe still has a point because she does a few things more cleanly than Emre: more reliable ranged pressure, better burst into grouped targets, and a stronger, simpler âtake space and force reactionsâ style. Community discussion also shows people comparing the two directly, with some players saying Ashe feels easier to value in more situations while Emre can be stronger in specific matchups or with the right perks.Why Ashe still matters
- Asheâs kit is built around consistent hitscan value at range, which makes her easier to slot into comps that want dependable damage from safe positions.
- Her dynamite gives her better poke and area pressure against clustered enemies, which can force movement and create openings even when she is not securing the kill herself.
- Her ultimate is seen by players as more flexible and less risky to use than Emreâs, especially when a team needs a fight-winning tool that can also contest space.
Where Emre can edge her out
- Some players argue Emre brings better burst, better survivability against dives, and a stronger overall âduelistâ feel in the right hands.
- A current stat comparison shows Emre and Ashe are close in pick rate, while Ashe is ahead on win rate in the last 30 days of competitive data.
- That lines up with the forum split: Emre may feel better in certain situations, but Ashe looks more broadly reliable overall.
Simple answer
So the point of Ashe is consistency. If you want cleaner long-range pressure, easier teamfight impact, and a more straightforward value curve, Ashe still has a strong niche even if Emre exists.In forum terms: Emre may be the âflashier answerâ for some players, but Ashe is still the âwhy are we ignoring the reliable one?â pick.
| Hero | What she/he does well | Community read |
|---|---|---|
| Ashe | Reliable range, burst into grouped targets, flexible utility | More consistent and broadly useful | [7][6][4]
| Emre | Burst, dive resistance, situational upside | Stronger in specific hands/matchups, but less universally clean | [8][2][7]