what would the jedi council think of raiden from mortal kombat

What Would the Jedi Council Think of Raiden from Mortal Kombat?

A crossover like this taps into a classic “order vs intervention” debate. Raiden, the thunder god and protector of Earthrealm, doesn’t map cleanly onto Jedi philosophy—and that tension is exactly what would fascinate (and worry) the Council.

First Impressions: Power Meets Responsibility

At a glance, the Jedi Council would likely see Raiden as:

A Force-sensitive analogue: His command over lightning, foresight, and spiritual awareness would feel familiar.
A guardian figure: Like the Jedi, he’s committed to protecting a realm from chaos.
A wildcard: Unlike Jedi, he operates without a strict code or council oversight.

They’d respect his intentions—but question his methods.

Where Raiden Aligns with Jedi Ideals

There are real overlaps that would earn Raiden cautious approval:

Protector role : Raiden consistently defends Earthrealm, much like Jedi defend peace in the Republic.
Self-sacrifice : He often risks (or loses) himself for the greater good.
Awareness of balance : Raiden understands that unchecked power—especially from Outworld or Netherrealm—must be contained.

A Jedi like Obi-Wan might see him as a “guardian without a temple.”

Where the Council Would Raise Eyebrows

This is where things get complicated.

Intervention vs non-attachment :
Raiden actively interferes in mortal affairs, sometimes manipulating events. The Jedi prefer guidance, not control.
Moral flexibility :
Raiden has made ethically gray decisions—rewriting timelines, allowing suffering to prevent worse outcomes.
Emotional investment :
He forms attachments and shows frustration, anger, even desperation—traits the Council warns against.

Mace Windu, in particular, would likely view Raiden as dangerously close to crossing into darker methods, even if his intentions remain good.

Individual Jedi Reactions (Speculative but Fun)

Yoda
Would sense great power and wisdom—but also imbalance. He might say Raiden is “guided by purpose, but clouded by urgency.”
Mace Windu
Suspicious. He respects strength but distrusts Raiden’s willingness to bend rules.
Ki-Adi-Mundi
Would question Raiden’s long-term judgment, especially his timeline manipulations.
Obi-Wan Kenobi
More sympathetic. He’d see Raiden as someone doing his best in impossible circumstances.
Anakin Skywalker (Council-era)
Ironically, he might admire Raiden’s decisiveness—the very trait the Council fears.

A Core Philosophical Clash

At the heart of it, the disagreement would come down to this:

The Jedi believe in balance through restraint.
Raiden believes in balance through intervention.

That difference matters. The Council might argue that Raiden’s actions risk creating the very chaos he tries to prevent—something they’ve seen before in their own Order.

How the Council Might Handle Him

If Raiden appeared in the Star Wars galaxy, the Council would likely:

Observe him closely rather than confront him immediately.
Attempt dialogue—understanding his motivations and limits.
Debate whether he represents a new kind of Force user or a potential threat.

Training him as a Jedi? Unlikely.
Working alongside him cautiously? Very possible.

A Forum-Style Take

“The Jedi Council wouldn’t call Raiden a Sith—but they definitely wouldn’t trust him as a Jedi either. He’s what happens when you give a Force user absolute authority and tell them to ‘figure it out.’”

Final Thoughts

Raiden sits in that gray zone the Jedi are famously uncomfortable with: powerful, well-intentioned, but willing to break philosophical rules to get results. The Council would respect him—but never fully endorse him. In another timeline, he might even be seen as a warning.

TL;DR

The Jedi Council would respect Raiden’s role as a protector but question his methods.
His willingness to interfere and manipulate events clashes with Jedi restraint.
He’d be viewed as a powerful ally—but also a philosophical risk.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.