Virginia Giuffre’s deposition in the Epstein–Maxwell cases references a number of prominent people, but it is important to separate two things:

  1. people she says abused or was trafficked to, and
  2. people who are simply mentioned in the questioning or in summaries of the transcript.

Below is a concise rundown of key names that public reporting and transcript summaries say appear in or around her deposition.

Core names she has accused

Public summaries of the Giuffre deposition and related court records say that she has alleged being trafficked or abused by several high‑profile men. These names include:

  • Prince Andrew (Duke of York)
  • Les Wexner (billionaire retail magnate; described as “one of the powerful business executives” she was trafficked to in a deposition used in related litigation)
  • Thomas Pritzker (Hyatt Hotels executive)
  • Marvin Minsky (late artificial‑intelligence researcher)
  • Bill Richardson (former New Mexico governor)
  • George Mitchell (former U.S. senator)
  • Glenn Dubin (billionaire financier)
  • Jean‑Luc Brunel (modeling agent)

These names appear in unsealed records and summaries as men she has said Epstein and/or Maxwell trafficked her to or placed her with. All of these individuals have publicly denied wrongdoing where they have commented.

Other prominent people mentioned or questioned about

Giuffre’s deposition and related filings also contain, or are summarized as containing, other well‑known names that lawyers ask her about in various contexts (for example, whether they were present in social circles, flights, or on Epstein’s properties), even if she does not accuse each of them of abuse.

Examples from a public deposition summary and related coverage include:

  • Jeffrey Epstein
  • Ghislaine Maxwell
  • Alan Dershowitz (Harvard law professor, a central figure in related defamation litigation)
  • Bill Clinton (former U.S. president)
  • Various staff or associates (such as Juan “John” Alessi, Sarah Kellen, Emmy Taylor, and others) who are discussed in the context of Epstein’s operations

Again, the fact that someone is named or asked about in a deposition does not, by itself, mean they are accused of a crime; depositions often range widely over anyone who might have been present, socialized with the parties, or been mentioned previously in media reports.

Why exact “lists” are tricky

There is no single short, official “Giuffre list” inside the deposition that cleanly separates everyone into one public chart.

  • The full May 3, 2016 transcript runs hundreds of pages, and lawyers jump between topics, documents, and prior interviews.
  • Some names arise because they were printed in media stories about Epstein, and Giuffre is asked to confirm, reject, or clarify details.
  • In at least one excerpt, when asked if there is a written “list of names,” she notes she does not have such a document in front of her.

So, any simplified list online is usually a reconstruction from:

  • direct accusations in court filings,
  • names repeated in multiple unsealed documents, and
  • deposition summaries prepared by journalists or archivists.

Context and cautions

Because this is ongoing, sensitive litigation history involving allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking, coverage strongly emphasizes that:

  • Many of the named individuals have denied the accusations.
  • No criminal charges were brought against most of the people mentioned in the deposition.
  • Courts unsealed these documents in the context of defamation and related civil cases, not criminal verdicts.

If you want to see the precise wording instead of summaries, your best route is to read the publicly posted transcript of the May 3, 2016 Virginia Giuffre deposition and the unsealed exhibits from the Epstein/Maxwell civil cases, which reproduce the questions and answers verbatim.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.