why does the host believe that the colonists had really been independent prior to the declaration of independence?
The colonists effectively operated as independent entities well before the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, due to a series of escalating actions that severed practical ties with Britain.
Key Pre-Independence Actions
By early 1776, colonial leaders had already assumed sovereign functions, treating themselves as self-governing despite lacking formal recognition.
- The First Continental Congress in 1774 coordinated boycotts and petitions, defying British laws like the Intolerable Acts.
- Battles at Lexington and Concord in April 1775 ignited open war, with colonists forming militias independent of British command.
- The Second Continental Congress in May 1775 created a Continental Army under George Washington, printed money, and established a post office—clear governmental acts.
Influence of Ideas and Events
Thomas Paine's Common Sense (January 1776) argued monarchies were flawed, urging full separation and swaying public opinion toward de facto independence. King George's rejection of the Olive Branch Petition later that year confirmed Britain's hostile stance, solidifying the colonists' self- reliant mindset.
Host's Likely Perspective
A host discussing this (perhaps in a history chat like the one analyzed) might emphasize that the Declaration merely formalized an existing reality: local governments had declared autonomy, armies fought autonomously, and colonies functioned without British oversight for over a year. This view frames July 1776 not as a sudden break but as legal acknowledgment of a revolution already underway.
TL;DR: Colonists were practically independent by 1775 through war, self- governance, and ideological shifts; the Declaration ratified this.
Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.