Right now, no one “new” has officially taken over Venezuela as a stable, long‑term government, and it is not yet clear who will ultimately control the country next.

What just happened

  • U.S. forces have captured Nicolás Maduro and removed him from power in a surprise overnight operation, ending his personal hold on the presidency for the moment.
  • President Donald Trump has publicly said the United States will run Venezuela “for now” during a transition, with a group of U.S. officials overseeing key decisions.
  • Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, has been described by Trump as being sworn in as president, but within a scenario where Washington claims it will manage the country’s transition.

So who is “taking over” right now?

In practical terms, there is a power struggle and an interim arrangement rather than a clear, legitimate successor.

  • The U.S. government is asserting de facto control over Venezuela’s direction, saying it will supervise the state until a “safe” transition is organized.
  • Delcy Rodríguez is being positioned as an on‑paper Venezuelan head of state aligned, at least for now, with U.S. demands and guidance.
  • The Venezuelan military remains a crucial wildcard: parts of it have been hit and shaken, but it still exists and its long‑term loyalty or resistance will heavily influence who truly governs.

Possible next scenarios (speculative but grounded)

No one can say with certainty who will ultimately rule, but current reporting and expert discussions point to a few broad paths:

  1. Extended U.S.-run transition
    • Washington keeps a military and political presence, using Rodríguez or another figurehead while U.S. officials control security and oil policy.
 * This might involve U.S. oil companies moving in to rebuild and operate Venezuela’s energy sector under transitional arrangements.
  1. Opposition‑led interim government
    • Opposition figures like María Corina Machado and Edmundo González are calling for recognition of the opposition’s electoral mandate and for a democratic transition.
 * If the U.S. and key regional powers decide to back them more directly, they could eventually be installed in a formal transitional government, though Trump has publicly questioned Machado’s viability as leader.
  1. Fragmentation or prolonged instability
    • Elements of the Venezuelan armed forces and ruling party structures could resist U.S. control and any chosen successor, potentially leading to internal conflict, parallel authorities, or insurgent violence.
 * Regional and international reactions (Latin American governments, the EU, Russia, China, etc.) will heavily shape how sustainable any U.S.-backed arrangement is.

How forums and commentators are talking about it

Online forums and political discussion spaces are treating Venezuela’s future as deeply uncertain, with debates over:

  • Whether this becomes a long, drawn‑out U.S. occupation versus a short, managed transition.
  • Fears that Venezuelans may see yet another cycle of external intervention, economic restructuring around oil, and possible disappointment if promised democracy and prosperity do not materialize.

In short: Maduro is out of the picture for now, the U.S. is trying to steer the transition, local elites and the opposition are maneuvering, and the real “takeover” is still being contested in real time.

TL;DR: At this moment, the U.S. government is asserting temporary control over Venezuela’s transition after capturing Maduro, while Delcy Rodríguez, the opposition, and the Venezuelan military all sit in a tense, unresolved power equation.

Information gathered from public forums or data available on the internet and portrayed here.